Prevalence of Clinical and Neuroimaging Markers in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Malhotra Konark1ORCID,Theodorou Aikaterini2ORCID,Katsanos Aristeidis H.23ORCID,Zompola Christina2ORCID,Shoamanesh Ashkan3ORCID,Boviatsis Efstathios4ORCID,Paraskevas George P.2ORCID,Spilioti Martha5ORCID,Cordonnier Charlotte6ORCID,Werring David J.7ORCID,Alexandrov Andrei V.8ORCID,Tsivgoulis Georgios28ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.).

2. Second Department of Neurology (A.T., A.H.K., C.Z., G.P.P., G.T.), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Greece.

3. Department of Neurology, McMaster University/Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada (A.H.K., A.S.).

4. Department of Neurosurgery (E.B.), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Greece.

5. First Department of Neurology, AHEPA General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (M.S.).

6. University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172, LilNCog, Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, France (C.C.).

7. Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom (D.J.W.).

8. Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis (A.V.A., G.T.).

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist regarding the prevalence of clinical and neuroimaging manifestations among patients diagnosed with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). We sought to determine the prevalence of clinical phenotypes and radiological markers in patients with CAA. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies including patients with CAA was conducted to primarily assess the prevalence of clinical phenotypes and neuroimaging markers as available in the included studies. Sensitivity analyses were performed based on the (1) retrospective or prospective study design and (2) probable or unspecified CAA status. We pooled the prevalence rates using random-effects models and assessed the heterogeneity using the Cochran Q and I 2 statistics. Results: We identified 12 prospective and 34 retrospective studies including 7159 patients with CAA. The pooled prevalence rates were cerebral microbleeds (52% [95% CI, 43%–60%]; I 2 =93%), cortical superficial siderosis (49% [95% CI, 38%–59%]; I 2 =95%), dementia or mild cognitive impairment (50% [95% CI, 35%–65%]; I 2 =97%), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; 44% [95% CI, 27%–61%]; I 2 =98%), transient focal neurological episodes (48%; 10 studies [95% CI, 29%–67%]; I 2 =97%), lacunar infarcts (30% [95% CI, 25%–36%]; I 2 =78%), high grades of perivascular spaces located in centrum semiovale (56% [95% CI, 44%–67%]; I 2 =88%) and basal ganglia (21% [95% CI, 2%–51%]; I 2 =98%), and white matter hyperintensities with moderate or severe Fazekas score (53% [95% CI, 40%–65%]; I 2 =91%). The only neuroimaging marker that was associated with higher odds of recurrent ICH was cortical superficial siderosis (odds ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.01–2.46]; I 2 =47%). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a higher prevalence of ICH (53% versus 16%; P =0.03) and transient focal neurological episodes (57% versus 17%; P =0.03) among retrospective studies compared with prospective studies. No difference was documented between the prevalence rates based on the CAA status. Conclusions: Approximately one-half of hospital-based cohort of CAA patients was observed to have cerebral microbleeds, cortical superficial siderosis, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, ICH, or transient focal neurological episodes. Cortical superficial siderosis was the only neuroimaging marker that was associated with higher odds of ICH recurrence. Future population-based studies among well-defined CAA cohorts are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3