Increasing Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Intensity Walking and Step Activity Intervention

Author:

Thompson Elizabeth D.1,Pohlig Ryan T.2,McCartney Kiersten M.1ORCID,Hornby T. George3ORCID,Kasner Scott E.4ORCID,Raser-Schramm Jonathan5,Miller Allison E.6ORCID,Henderson Christopher E.3ORCID,Wright Henry1,Wright Tamara1,Reisman Darcy S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy (E.D.T., K.M.M., H.W., T.W., D.S.R.), University of Delaware, Newark.

2. Biostatistics Core (R.T.P.), University of Delaware, Newark.

3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University, Indianapolis (T.G.H., C.E.H.).

4. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.E.K.).

5. Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (J.R.-S.).

6. Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (A.E.M.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity in people with chronic stroke profoundly affects daily function and increases recurrent stroke risk and mortality, making physical activity improvements an important target of intervention. We compared the effects of a high-intensity walking intervention (FAST), a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention (SAM), or a combined intervention (FAST+SAM) on physical activity (ie, steps/day). We hypothesized the combined intervention would yield the greatest increase in steps/day. METHODS: This assessor-blinded multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted at 4 university/hospital-based laboratories. Participants were 21 to 85 years old, walking without physical assistance following a single, unilateral noncerebellar stroke of ≥6 months duration, and randomly assigned to FAST, SAM, or FAST+SAM for 12 weeks (2–3 sessions/week). FAST training consisted of walking-related activities at 70% to 80% heart rate reserve, while SAM received daily feedback and goal setting of walking activity (steps/day). Assessors and study statistician were masked to group assignment. The a priori–determined primary outcome and end point was a comparison of the change in steps/day between the 3 intervention groups from pre- to post-intervention. Adverse events were tracked after randomization. All randomized participants were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Participants were enrolled from July 18, 2016, to November 16, 2021. Of 2385 participants initially screened, 250 participants were randomized (mean [SE] age, 63 [0.80] years; 116 females/134 males), with 89 assigned to FAST, 81 to SAM, and 80 to FAST+SAM. Steps/day significantly increased in both the SAM (mean [SE], 1542 [267; 95% CI, 1014–2069] P <0.001) and FAST+SAM group (1307 [280; 95% CI, 752–1861] P <0.001) but not in the FAST group (406 [238; 95% CI, −63 to 876] P =0.09). There were no deaths or serious study-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Only individuals with chronic stroke who completed a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention with skilled coaching and goal progression demonstrated improvements in physical activity (steps/day). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02835313.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3