The Cardiovascular Quality Improvement and Care Innovation Consortium

Author:

,Bradley Steven M.1,Adusumalli Srinath2ORCID,Amin Amit P.3ORCID,Borden William B.4,Das Sandeep R.5ORCID,Downey William E.6,Ebinger Joseph E.7,Gelbman Joy8,Gluckman Ty J.9ORCID,Goyal Abhinav10,Gupta Divya10,Khot Umesh N.11,Levy Andrew E.1213ORCID,Mutharasan R. Kannan14,Rush Pam1,Strauss Craig E.1,Shreenivas Satya15,Ho P. Michael1617

Affiliation:

1. Healthcare Delivery Innovation Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute, MN (S.M.B., P.R., C.E.S.).

2. Center for Healthcare Innovation, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.A.).

3. Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO (A.P.A.).

4. George Washington University, DC (W.B.B.).

5. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Center for Innovation and Value at Parkland, Dallas (S.R.D.).

6. Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (W.E.D.).

7. Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA (J.E.E.).

8. New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine (J.G.).

9. Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science (CARDS), Providence Heart Institute, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR (T.J.G.).

10. Emory Heart and Vascular Center and the Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine (A.G., D.G.).

11. Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation, Cleveland Clinic, OH (U.N.K.).

12. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (A.E.L.).

13. Denver Health and Hospital Authority, CO (A.E.L.).

14. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (R.K.M.).

15. Lindner Center for Research, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH (S.S.).

16. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (P.M.H.).

17. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora (P.M.H.).

Abstract

Despite decades of improvement in the quality and outcomes of cardiovascular care, significant gaps remain. Existing quality improvement strategies are often limited in scope to specific clinical conditions and episodic care. Health services and outcomes research is essential to inform gaps in care but rarely results in the development and implementation of care delivery solutions. Although individual health systems are engaged in projects to improve the quality of care delivery, these efforts often lack a robust study design or implementation evaluation that can inform generalizability and further dissemination. Aligning the work of health care systems and health services and outcomes researchers could serve as a strategy to overcome persisting gaps in cardiovascular quality and outcomes. We describe the inception of the Cardiovascular Quality Improvement and Care Innovation Consortium that seeks to rapidly improve cardiovascular care by (1) developing, implementing, and evaluating multicenter quality improvement projects using innovative care designs; (2) serving as a resource for quality improvement and care innovation partners; and (3) establishing a presence within existing quality improvement and care innovation structures. Success of the collaborative will be defined by projects that result in changes to care delivery with demonstrable impacts on the quality and outcomes of care across multiple health systems. Furthermore, insights gained from implementation of these projects across sites in Cardiovascular Quality Improvement and Care Innovation Consortium will inform and promote broad dissemination for greater impact.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3