Direct Comparison of Whole-Heart Navigator-Gated Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography and 40- and 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography to Detect the Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Conventional Coronary Angiography

Author:

Pouleur Anne-Catherine1,le Polain de Waroux Jean-Benoît1,Kefer Joelle1,Pasquet Agnès1,Vanoverschelde Jean-Louis1,Gerber Bernhard L.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Divisions of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc UCL, Brussels, Belgium.

Abstract

Background— Both whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography (WH-MRCA) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) have been proposed for the noninvasive identification of the coronary stenosis. The authors sought to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of these noninvasive imaging techniques using the invasive quantitative coronary angiography as a reference standard. Methods and Results— Seventy-seven consecutive patients (56 men, 61�14 years) prospectively underwent WH-MRCA and 40- or 64-slice MDCT before the quantitative coronary angiography. Diagnostic accuracy of WH-MRCA and MDCT for the visual identification of >50% diameter stenosis in segments of >1.5 mm size was compared using the quantitative coronary angiography as a reference. According to the quantitative coronary angiography, 49 of 992 coronary segments >1.5 mm diameter had >50% diameter stenosis. MDCT had a higher success rate (100% versus 88%, P <0.001) and enabled identification of more segments (963 versus 726, P <0.001) than did WH-MRCA. On a per-segment basis, WH-MRCA had similar sensitivity (47/49 or 96% versus 48/49 or 98%, P =0.9) but significantly lower specificity (644/943 or 68% versus 863/943 or 92%, P <0.001) and accuracy (691/992 or 70% versus 911/992 or 92%, P <0.001) for the detection of >50% diameter stenosis than did MDCT. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity was similar (17/17 or 100% versus 16/17 or 94%, P =0.9), but specificity (43/60 or 72% versus 53/60 or 88%, P =0.024) and diagnostic accuracy (60/77 or 78%, versus 69/77 or 90%, P =0.044) of WH-MRCA for the detection of >50% diameter stenosis were significantly lower than of MDCT. Conclusions— Because of the higher success rate and higher number of interpretable segments, 40- or 64-slice MDCT performs better than WH-MRCA.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3