Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Obayashi Yuki1ORCID,Shiomi Hiroki1ORCID,Morimoto Takeshi2ORCID,Tamaki Yodo3ORCID,Inoko Moriaki4,Yamamoto Ko1ORCID,Takeji Yasuaki1,Tada Tomohisa5,Nagao Kazuya6,Yamaji Kyohei7ORCID,Kaneda Kazuhisa8,Suwa Satoru9,Tamura Toshihiro3,Sakamoto Hiroki5,Inada Tsukasa6ORCID,Matsuda Mitsuo10,Sato Yukihito11,Furukawa Yutaka12ORCID,Ando Kenji7ORCID,Kadota Kazushige13,Nakagawa Yoshihisa14ORCID,Kimura Takeshi1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology Hyogo College of Medicine Nishinomiya Japan

3. Department of Cardiology Tenri Hospital Tenri Japan

4. Cardiovascular Center Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital Osaka Japan

5. Department of Cardiology Shizuoka General Hospital Shizuoka Japan

6. Department of Cardiovascular Center Osaka Red Cross Hospital Osaka Japan

7. Department of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu Japan

8. Department of Cardiology Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital Kyoto Japan

9. Department of Cardiology Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital Izunokuni Japan

10. Department of Cardiology Kishiwada City Hospital Kishiwada Japan

11. Department of Cardiology Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center Amagasaki Japan

12. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan

13. Department of Cardiology Kurashiki Central Hospital Kurashiki Japan

14. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Shiga University of Medical Science Shiga Japan

Abstract

Background It remains controversial whether long‐term clinical impact of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is different from that of prior AF diagnosed before the onset of AMI. Methods and Results The current study population from the CREDO‐Kyoto AMI (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Acute Myocardial Infarction) Registry Wave‐2 consisted of 6228 patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. The baseline characteristics and long‐term clinical outcomes were compared according to AF status (newly diagnosed AF: N=489 [7.9%], prior AF: N=589 [9.5%], and no AF: N=5150 [82.7%]). Median follow‐up duration was 5.5 years. Patients with newly diagnosed AF and prior AF had similar baseline characteristics with higher risk profile than those with no AF including older age and more comorbidities. The cumulative 5‐year incidence of all‐cause death was higher in newly diagnosed AF and prior AF than no AF (38.8%, 40.7%, and 18.7%, P <0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality of newly diagnosed AF and prior AF relative to no AF remained significant with similar magnitude (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12–1.54; P <0.001, and HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14–1.52; P <0.001, respectively). The cumulative 5‐year incidence of stroke decreased in the order of newly diagnosed AF, prior AF and no AF (15.5%, 12.9%, and 6.3%, respectively, P <0.001). The higher adjusted HRs of both newly diagnosed AF and prior AF relative to no AF were significant for stroke, with a greater risk of newly diagnosed AF than that of prior AF (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.56–2.69; P <0.001, and HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.00–1.78; P =0.048, respectively). The higher stroke risk of newly diagnosed AF compared with prior AF was largely driven by the greater risk within 30 days. The higher adjusted HRs of newly diagnosed AF and prior AF relative to no AF were significant for heart failure hospitalization (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.35–2.22; P <0.001, and HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.82–2.74; P <0.001, respectively) and major bleeding (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23–1.73; P <0.001, and HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15–1.60; P <0.001, respectively). Conclusions Newly diagnosed AF in AMI had risks for mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and major bleeding higher than no AF, and comparable to prior AF. The risk of newly diagnosed AF for stroke might be higher than that of prior AF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3