Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Lubitz Steven A.12ORCID,Atlas Steven J.3,Ashburner Jeffrey M.32ORCID,Lipsanopoulos Ana T. Trisini4,Borowsky Leila H.3,Guan Wyliena5,Khurshid Shaan12ORCID,Ellinor Patrick T.12ORCID,Chang Yuchiao32,McManus David D.36,Singer Daniel E.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias and Cardiovascular Research Center (S.A.L., S.K., P.T.E.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.A.L., J.M.A., S.K., P.T.E., Y.C., D.E.S.).

3. Division of General Internal Medicine (S.J.A., J.M.A., L.H.B., Y.C., D.E.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

4. Division of Cardiology (A.T.T.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

5. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (W.G.).

6. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (D.D.M.).

Abstract

Background: Undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) may cause preventable strokes. Guidelines differ regarding AF screening recommendations. We tested whether point-of-care screening with a handheld single-lead ECG at primary care practice visits increases diagnoses of AF. Methods: We randomized 16 primary care clinics 1:1 to AF screening using a handheld single-lead ECG (AliveCor KardiaMobile) during vital sign assessments, or usual care. Patients included were ages ≥65 years. Screening results were provided to primary care clinicians at the encounter. All confirmatory diagnostic testing and treatment decisions were made by the primary care clinician. New AF diagnoses during the 1-year follow-up were ascertained electronically and manually adjudicated. Proportions and incidence rates were calculated. Effect heterogeneity was assessed. Results: Of 30 715 patients without prevalent AF (n=15 393 screening [91% screened], n=15 322 control), 1.72% of individuals in the screening group had new AF diagnosed at 1 year versus 1.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.13% [95% CI, –0.16 to 0.42]; P =0.38). In prespecified subgroup analyses, new AF diagnoses in the screening and control groups were greater among those aged ≥85 years (5.56% versus 3.76%, respectively; risk difference, 1.80% [95% CI, 0.18 to 3.30]). The difference in newly diagnosed AF between the screening period and the previous year was marginally greater in the screening versus control group (0.32% versus –0.12%; risk difference, 0.43% [95% CI, –0.01 to 0.84]). The proportion of individuals with newly diagnosed AF who were initiated on oral anticoagulants was not different in the screening (n=194, 73.5%) and control (n=172, 70.8%) arms (risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, –5.5 to 10.4]). Conclusions: Screening for AF using a single-lead ECG at primary care visits did not affect new AF diagnoses among all individuals aged 65 years or older compared with usual care. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03515057.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3