Do Self-Management Interventions Work in Patients With Heart Failure?

Author:

Jonkman Nini H.1,Westland Heleen1,Groenwold Rolf H.H.1,Ågren Susanna1,Atienza Felipe1,Blue Lynda1,Bruggink-André de la Porte Pieta W.F.1,DeWalt Darren A.1,Hebert Paul L.1,Heisler Michele1,Jaarsma Tiny1,Kempen Gertrudis I.J.M.1,Leventhal Marcia E.1,Lok Dirk J.A.1,Mårtensson Jan1,Muñiz Javier1,Otsu Haruka1,Peters-Klimm Frank1,Rich Michael W.1,Riegel Barbara1,Strömberg Anna1,Tsuyuki Ross T.1,van Veldhuisen Dirk J.1,Trappenburg Jaap C.A.1,Schuurmans Marieke J.1,Hoes Arno W.1

Affiliation:

1. From Department of Rehabilitation, Nursing Science and Sports (N.H.J., H.W., J.C.A.T., M.J.S.) and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (R.H.H.G., A.W.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Departments of Medical and Health Sciences and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (S.Å.), Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Nursing Science (S.Å., A.S.), Department of Social and Welfare Studies (T.J.), and Department of Cardiology (A.S.), Linköping...

Abstract

Background— Self-management interventions are widely implemented in the care for patients with heart failure (HF). However, trials show inconsistent results, and whether specific patient groups respond differently is unknown. This individual patient data meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of self-management interventions in patients with HF and whether subgroups of patients respond differently. Methods and Results— A systematic literature search identified randomized trials of self-management interventions. Data from 20 studies, representing 5624 patients, were included and analyzed with the use of mixed-effects models and Cox proportional-hazard models, including interaction terms. Self-management interventions reduced the risk of time to the combined end point of HF-related hospitalization or all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–0.89), time to HF-related hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69–0.92), and improved 12-month HF-related quality of life (standardized mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.00–0.30). Subgroup analysis revealed a protective effect of self-management on the number of HF-related hospital days in patients <65 years of age (mean, 0.70 versus 5.35 days; interaction P =0.03). Patients without depression did not show an effect of self-management on survival (hazard ratio for all-cause mortality, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69–1.06), whereas in patients with moderate/severe depression, self-management reduced survival (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06–1.83, interaction P =0.01). Conclusions— This study shows that self-management interventions had a beneficial effect on time to HF-related hospitalization or all-cause death and HF-related hospitalization alone and elicited a small increase in HF-related quality of life. The findings do not endorse limiting self-management interventions to subgroups of patients with HF, but increased mortality in depressed patients warrants caution in applying self-management strategies in these patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3