Affiliation:
1. From the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco (C.E.T., S.A.G.); and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (S.A.G.).
Abstract
Background—
Secondhand smoke causes cardiovascular and respiratory disease. Smoke-free legislation is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization and death from these diseases.
Methods and Results—
Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted by law comprehensiveness to determine the relationship between smoke-free legislation and hospital admission or death from cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases. Studies were identified by using a systematic search for studies published before November 30, 2011 with the use of the Science Citation Index, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase and references in identified articles. Change in hospital admissions (or deaths) in the presence of a smoke-free law, duration of follow-up, and law comprehensiveness (workplaces only; workplaces and restaurants; or workplaces, restaurants, and bars) were recorded. Forty-five studies of 33 smoke-free laws with median follow-up of 24 months (range, 2–57 months) were included. Comprehensive smoke-free legislation was associated with significantly lower rates of hospital admissions (or deaths) for all 4 diagnostic groups: coronary events (relative risk, 0.848; 95% confidence interval 0.816–0.881), other heart disease (relative risk, 0.610; 95% confidence interval, 0.440–0.847), cerebrovascular accidents (relative risk, 0.840; 95% confidence interval, 0.753–0.936), and respiratory disease (relative risk, 0.760; 95% confidence interval, 0.682–0.846). The difference in risk following comprehensive smoke-free laws does not change with longer follow-up. More comprehensive laws were associated with larger changes in risk.
Conclusions—
Smoke-free legislation was associated with a lower risk of smoking-related cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases, with more comprehensive laws associated with greater changes in risk.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference62 articles.
1. California Environmental Protection Agency.
Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant.
2005.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/ets2006/ets2006.htm.
Accessed October 3 2012.
2. US Department of Health and Human Services.
The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General.
Atlanta GA: US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Coordinating Center for Health Promotion National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
3. IOM (Institute of Medicine).
Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Cardiovascular Effects: Making Sense of the Evidence.
Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
4. Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption;Callinan JE;Cochrane Database Syst Rev.,2010
5. Is there an impact of public smoking bans on self-reported smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke?