Randomized Comparison of Strategies for Type B Aortic Dissection

Author:

Nienaber Christoph A.1,Rousseau Hervé1,Eggebrecht Holger1,Kische Stephan1,Fattori Rossella1,Rehders Tim C.1,Kundt Günther1,Scheinert Dierk1,Czerny Martin1,Kleinfeldt Tilo1,Zipfel Burkhart1,Labrousse Louis1,Ince Hüseyin1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of Rostock, Divisions of Cardiology and Biomedical Statistics (C.A.N., S.K., T.C.R., G.K., T.K., H.I.), Rostock, Germany; University of Duisburg-Essen (H.E.), Essen, Germany; University Heart Center Leipzig (D.S.), Leipzig, Germany; German Heart Institute Berlin (B.Z.), Berlin, Germany; the Centre Hospitalière Universitaire, Hôpital de Rangueil (H.R.), Toulouse, France; the Universitá St. Orsola Malpighi (R.F.), Bologna, Italy; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (M.C.),...

Abstract

Background— Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) represents a novel concept for type B aortic dissection. Although life-saving in acute emergencies, outcomes and survival of TEVAR in stable dissection are unknown. Methods and Results— One hundred forty patients in stable clinical condition at least 2 weeks after index dissection were randomly subjected to elective stent-graft placement in addition to optimal medical therapy (n=72) or to optimal medical therapy alone (n=68) with surveillance (arterial pressure according to World Health Organization guidelines ≤120/80 mm Hg). The primary end point was all-cause death at 2 years, whereas aorta-related death, progression (with need for conversion or additional endovascular or open surgery), and aortic remodeling were secondary end points. There was no difference in all-cause deaths, with a 2-year cumulative survival rate of 95.6±2.5% with optimal medical therapy versus 88.9±3.7% with TEVAR ( P =0.15); the trial, however, turned out to be underpowered. Moreover, the aorta-related death rate was not different ( P =0.44), and the risk for the combined end point of aorta-related death (rupture) and progression (including conversion or additional endovascular or open surgery) was similar ( P =0.65). Three neurological adverse events occurred in the TEVAR group (1 paraplegia, 1 stroke, and 1 transient paraparesis), versus 1 case of paraparesis with medical treatment. Finally, aortic remodeling (with true-lumen recovery and thoracic false-lumen thrombosis) occurred in 91.3% of patients with TEVAR versus 19.4% of those who received medical treatment ( P <0.001), which suggests ongoing aortic remodeling. Conclusions— In the first randomized study on elective stent-graft placement in survivors of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection, TEVAR failed to improve 2-year survival and adverse event rates despite favorable aortic remodeling. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00525356.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 646 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3