Deliberating the Diagnostic Dilemma of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Author:

Ho Jennifer E.123ORCID,Redfield Margaret M.4,Lewis Gregory D.13,Paulus Walter J.5ORCID,Lam Carolyn S.P.6789ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Corrigan Minehan Heart Center (J.E.H., G.D.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

2. Cardiovascular Research Center (JE.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (J.E.H., G.D.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

4. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.M.R.).

5. Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands (W.J.P.).

6. National Heart Centre Singapore (C.S.P.L.).

7. National Heart Center Singapore & Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore (C.S.P.L.).

8. Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (C.S.P.L.).

9. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia (C.S.P.L.).

Abstract

There is a lack of consensus on how we define heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), with wide variation in diagnostic criteria across society guidelines. This lack of uniformity in disease definition stems in part from an incomplete understanding of disease pathobiology, phenotypic heterogeneity, and natural history. We review current knowledge gaps and existing diagnostic tools and algorithms. We present a simple approach to implement these tools within the constraints of the current knowledge base, addressing separately (1) hospitalized individuals with rest congestion, where diagnosis is more straightforward; and (2) individuals with exercise intolerance, where diagnosis is more complex. Here, a potential role for advanced or provocative testing, including evaluation of hemodynamic responses to exercise is considered. More importantly, we propose focus areas for future studies to develop accurate and feasible diagnostic tools for HFpEF, including animal models that recapitulate human HFpEF, and human studies that both address a fundamental understanding of HFpEF pathobiology, and new diagnostic approaches and tools, as well. In sum, there is an urgent need to more accurately define the syndrome of HFpEF to inform diagnosis, patient selection for clinical trials, and, ultimately, future therapeutic approaches.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3