Impact of Regionalization of ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care on Treatment Times and Outcomes for Emergency Medical Services–Transported Patients Presenting to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Author:

Jollis James G.12,Al-Khalidi Hussein R.1,Roettig Mayme L.1,Berger Peter B.,Corbett Claire C.3,Doerfler Shannon M.1,Fordyce Christopher B.4,Henry Timothy D.5,Hollowell Lori,Magdon-Ismail Zainab6,Kochar Ajar1,McCarthy James J.7,Monk Lisa1,O’Brien Peter8,Rea Thomas D.9,Shavadia Jay1,Tamis-Holland Jacqueline10,Wilson B. Hadley11,Ziada Khaled M.12,Granger Christopher B.1

Affiliation:

1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (J.G.J., H.R.A.-K., M.L.R., S.D., A.K., L.M., J.S., C.B.G.)

2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (J.G.J.)

3. New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC (C.C.C.)

4. Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (C.B.F.)

5. Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (T.D.H.)

6. American Heart Association, Dallas, TX (Z.M.-I.Z)

7. McGovern School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (J.J.M.)

8. Centra Lynchburg General Hospital, VA (P.O’B.)

9. University of Washington, Seattle (T.D.R.)

10. Mount Sinai Saint Luke’s Hospital, New York, NY (J.T.-H.)

11. Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC (B.H.W.)

12. University of Kentucky, Lexington (K.M.Z.).

Abstract

Background: Regional variations in reperfusion times and mortality in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction are influenced by differences in coordinating care between emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals. Building on the Accelerator-1 Project, we hypothesized that time to reperfusion could be further reduced with enhanced regional efforts. Methods: Between April 2015 and March 2017, we worked with 12 metropolitan regions across the United States with 132 percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals and 946 EMS agencies. Data were collected in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network)-Get With The Guidelines Registry for quarterly Mission: Lifeline reports. The primary end point was the change in the proportion of EMS-transported patients with first medical contact to device time ≤90 minutes from baseline to final quarter. We also compared treatment times and mortality with patients treated in hospitals not participating in the project during the corresponding time period. Results: During the study period, 10 730 patients were transported to percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals, including 974 in the baseline quarter and 972 in the final quarter who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 61 years; 27% were women, 6% had cardiac arrest, and 6% had shock on admission; 10% were black, 12% were Latino, and 10% were uninsured. By the end of the intervention, all process measures reflecting coordination between EMS and hospitals had improved, including the proportion of patients with a first medical contact to device time of ≤90 minutes (67%–74%; P <0.002), a first medical contact to device time to catheterization laboratory activation of ≤20 minutes (38%–56%; P <0.0001), and emergency department dwell time of ≤20 minutes (33%–43%; P <0.0001). Of the 12 regions, 9 regions reduced first medical contact to device time, and 8 met or exceeded the national goal of 75% of patients treated in ≤90 minutes. Improvements in treatment times corresponded with a significant reduction in mortality (in-hospital death, 4.4%–2.3%; P =0.001) that was not apparent in hospitals not participating in the project during the same time period. Conclusions: Organization of care among EMS and hospitals in 12 regions was associated with significant reductions in time to reperfusion in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction as well as in in-hospital mortality. These findings support a more intensive regional approach to emergency care for patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3