Characterization of Individuals With Apparent Resistant Hypertension Using Contemporary Guidelines: Insights From CV-QUIC

Author:

Ebinger Joseph E.1ORCID,Gluckman Ty J.2,Magraner Jose1,Chiu Shih Ting2,Rider Deanna3,Thomas Chelsey4,Das Sandeep R.5ORCID,Ho P. Michael6ORCID,Shreenivas Satya7,Bradley Steven8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (J.E.E., J.M.).

2. Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science, Providence Heart Institute, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR (T.J.G., S.T.C.).

3. Providence Research Network, Missoula, MT (D.R.).

4. Health Catalyst, Minneapolis, MN (C.T.).

5. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Center for Innovation and Value at Parkland, Dallas (S.R.D.).

6. University of Colorado School of Medicine, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora (P.M.H.).

7. Lindner Center for Research, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH (S.S.).

8. Healthcare Delivery Innovation Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute, MN (S.B.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apparent resistant hypertension (aRH) carries excess cardiovascular risk beyond nonresistant forms of hypertension; however, our understanding of this at-risk population, as defined by current US practice guidelines, is limited. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and pharmacotherapeutic patterns of patients with aRH using contemporary blood pressure guidance. METHODS: We classified patients at 3 large healthcare systems by hypertensive status using contemporary hypertension guidelines. We subsequently described the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with aRH and compared these factors among hypertensive patients without aRH and between those with controlled and uncontrolled aRH. RESULTS: A total of 2 420 468 patients were analyzed, of whom 1 343 489 (55.6%) were hypertensive according to contemporary guidelines. Among hypertensive patients, 11 992 (8.5%) met criteria for aRH, with nearly all assessed comorbid conditions, particularly diabetes and heart failure, being more common in those with aRH. When compared with patients with uncontrolled aRH, those with controlled aRH were more frequently prescribed a beta-blocker, diuretic, and nitrate, with the largest standardized difference observed for a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (35.4% versus 10.4%, Cohen D 0.62). Consistent findings were noted in sensitivity analyses using the blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of over 2.4 million individuals, a lower prevalence of aRH was observed than previously reported (12%–15%), but with a high burden of comorbidities. Identification of differences in pharmacotherapy between patients with controlled and uncontrolled aRH, particularly lower rates of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use, help define potential opportunities to improve care and lower cardiovascular risk.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3