Under-Reporting of Socioeconomic Status of Patients in Stroke Trials

Author:

Magin Parker1,Victoire Anousha1,Zhen Xi May1,Furler John1,Pirotta Marie1,Lasserson Daniel S.1,Levi Christopher1,Tapley Amanda1,van Driel Mieke1

Affiliation:

1. From the Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health Research (C.L.), Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine and Public Health (P.M., A.V.), University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (X.M.Z, M.v.D.); Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.F., M.P.); Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford,...

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The 2001 Revised Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement requires reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to include participants’ baseline demographics. This enables comparison of intervention and control groups on potential confounding variables as well as assessment of study generalizability. Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with access to care and outcomes (mortality, functional outcome, recurrent stroke, and hospital readmission) poststroke. We aimed to document the reporting of baseline SES in reports of RCTs of stroke and transient ischemic attack. Methods— Measures of SES were extracted from studies reporting trials of stroke or transient ischemic attack published in 12 major journals in the disciplines of general medicine, general neurology, cerebrovascular disease, and rehabilitation subsequent to revised CONSORT. Percentages of studies reporting SES measures were calculated. Differences in reporting between journal categories, and temporal trends in reporting, were tested. Results— Only 12% of studies reported any SES measure. Journal categories did not differ in rate of SES reporting. SES reporting did not increase over time. Conclusions— Improving reporting of SES could enhance clinicians’ ability to evaluate RCT findings and apply them to their patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3