Validity and Reliability of Neurological Scores in Mice Exposed to Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Author:

Bieber Michael1,Gronewold Janine2,Scharf Anne-Carina2,Schuhmann Michael K.1,Langhauser Friederike12,Hopp Sarah13,Mencl Stine12,Geuss Eva1,Leinweber Jonas1,Guthmann Josua1,Doeppner Thorsten R.4,Kleinschnitz Christoph12,Stoll Guido1,Kraft Peter15,Hermann Dirk M.2

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Neurology (M.B., M.K.S., F.L., S.M., E.G., J.L., J. Guthmann, C.K., G.S., P.K.), University Hospital Würzburg, Germany

2. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany (J. Gronewold, A.-C.S., F.L., S.M., C.K., D.M.H.)

3. Neurosurgery (S.H.), University Hospital Würzburg, Germany

4. Department of Neurology, University of Göttingen Medical School, Germany (T.R.D.)

5. Department of Neurology, Klinikum Main-Spessart, Lohr, Germany (P.K.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The selection of appropriate neurological scores and tests is crucial for the evaluation of stroke consequences. The validity and reliability of neurological deficit scores and tests has repeatedly been questioned in ischemic stroke models in the past. Methods— In 198 male mice exposed to transient intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion, we examined the validity and reliability of 11 neurological scores (Bederson score 0–3, Bederson score 0–4, Bederson score 0–5, modified neurological severity [0–14], subjective overall impression [0–10], or simple neurological tests: grip test, latency to move body length test, pole test, wire hanging test, negative geotaxis test, and elevated body swing test) in the acute stroke phase, that is, after 24 hours. Combinations of neurological scores or tests for predicting infarct volume were statistically analyzed. Results— Infarct volume was left skewed (median [Q1–Q3], 78.4 [54.8–101.3] mm 3 ). Among all tests, the Bederson (0–5; r=0.63, P <0.001), modified neurological severity (r=0.80, P <0.001), and subjective overall impression (r=−0.63, P <0.001) scores had the highest test validities, using infarct volume as external reference. Subjective overall impression had the best agreement between 5 raters (Kendall W=0.11, P <0.001). The Bederson (0–5) score discriminated infarct volume in mice with small (≤50 mm 3 ; r=0.33, P =0.027) and large (>50 mm 3 ; r=0.48, P <0.001) brain infarcts, all other tests only in mice with large infarcts. Combining subjective overall impression with Bederson (0–5) score explained 47.6% of the variance of infarct volume. Conclusions— Despite their simplicity, the Bederson (0–5) score, modified neurological severity score, and subjective overall impression have reasonable validity and reliability in the acute stroke phase. The Bederson (0–5) score equally distinguishes infarct volume in small and large infarcts. Visual Overview— An online visual overview is available for this article.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3