Predictive Performance of PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) for Screening Preeclampsia in Asymptomatic Women

Author:

Agrawal Swati1,Shinar Shiri1,Cerdeira Ana Sofia2,Redman Christopher2,Vatish Manu2

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada (S.A., S.S.)

2. Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (A.S.C., C.R., M.V.).

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a systemic syndrome that seems to originate from the placenta and is associated with an imbalance between angiogenic factors in the maternal circulation. One of the well-studied and widely used factors is PlGF (placental growth factor), the levels of which drop in women destined to develop preeclampsia. This drop is known to precede the development of actual signs and symptoms of preeclampsia, thus proving to be a useful screening tool in predicting the disease. The literature varies widely in terms of the clinical usefulness of the test. We conducted a meta-analysis to study the predictive accuracy of PlGF in asymptomatic women. Our analysis included 40 studies with 3189 cases of preeclampsia and 89 498 controls. The overall predictive odds ratio of the test was 9 (6–13). Subgroup analysis evaluating various PlGF thresholds demonstrated that the predictive values were highest for PlGF levels between 80 and 120 pg/mL with a high predictive odds ratio of 25 (7–88), a sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67–0.86), a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75–0.95), a positive likelihood ratio of 6.3 (95% CI, 2.7–14.7), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.16–0.42). Additionally, the accuracy was higher when the test was performed after 14 weeks of gestation (OR, 10 [7–15]) and for prediction of early onset preeclampsia (OR, 18 [9–37]). We conclude that PlGF is a useful screening tool to predict preeclampsia. Nonetheless, its utility should be judged with caution and randomized controlled trials are warranted to explore if its implementation improves perinatal outcomes in asymptomatic women.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3