Diagnosis and Monitoring of White Coat Hypertension in Pregnancy: an ISSHP Consensus Delphi Procedure

Author:

Johnson Sonia1ORCID,Gordijn Sanne2ORCID,Damhuis Stefanie2,Ganzevoort Wessel3ORCID,Brown Mark4,von Dadelszen Peter5ORCID,Magee Laura A.5ORCID,Khalil Asma67ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Barts and the London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (S.J.).

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (S.G., S.D.).

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands (W.G.).

4. Department of Renal Medicine, St. George Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (M.B.).

5. Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (P.v.D., L.A.M.).

6. Fetal Medicine Unit, St George’s Hospital (A.K.), St George’s University of London, United Kingdom.

7. Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (A.K.), St George’s University of London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background: There is no accepted definition or standardized monitoring for white coat hypertension in pregnancy. This Delphi procedure aimed to reach consensus on out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and white coat hypertension diagnostic criteria and monitoring. Method: Relevant international experts completed three rounds of a modified Delphi questionnaire. For each item, the predefined cutoff for group consensus was ≥70% agreement, with 60% to 70% considered to warrant reconsideration at the subsequent round, and <60% considered insufficient to warrant consideration. Results: Of 230 experts, 137 completed the first round and 114 (114/137, 83.2%) completed all three. For out-of-office BP monitoring, there was consensus that home BP monitoring (HBPM) should be chosen; instructions given, pairs of BP values taken, opportunity given for women to qualify values they do not regard as valid, and BP considered evaluated when ≥25% of values are above a cutoff. For HBPM, BP should be taken at least 2 to 3 d/wk, at minimum in the morning; however, many factors may affect frequency and timing. Experts endorsed a clinic BP <140/90 mm Hg as normal. While not reaching consensus, most agreed that HBPM values should be lower than clinic BP. Among those, HBPM <135/85 mm Hg was considered normal. There was consensus that white coat hypertension warrants: HBPM at least 1 d/wk before 20 weeks, 2 to 3 d/wk after 20 weeks or if persistent hypertension develops, and symptom monitoring (ie, headache, visual symptoms, and right upper quadrant/epigastric pain). Conclusions: Consensus-based diagnostic criteria and monitoring strategies should inform clinical care and research, to facilitate evaluation of out-of-office BP monitoring on pregnancy outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3