Assessment of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and DDDR Mode-Switching Pacemaker Versus Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Severely Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Author:

Brignole Michele1,Gianfranchi Lorella1,Menozzi Carlo1,Alboni Paolo1,Musso Giacomo1,Bongiorni Maria Grazia1,Gasparini Maurizio1,Raviele Antonio1,Lolli Gino1,Paparella Nelly1,Acquarone Simonetta1

Affiliation:

1. From the Section of Arrhythmology, Ospedali Riuniti, Lavagna (M.B., L.G.); Department of Cardiology and Arrhythmological Center, Ospedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia (C.M., G.L.); Department of Cardiology and Arrhythmological Center, Ospedale Civile, Cento (P.A., N.P.); Section of Arrhythmology, Ospedale Civile, Imperia (G.M., S.A.); Institute of Clinical Physiology, Centro Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa (M.G.B.); Department of Cardiology, Service of Arrhythmology, Ospedale Niguarda, Milano (M.G.);...

Abstract

Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of AV junction ablation and pacemaker implantation on quality of life and specific symptoms in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) not controlled by drugs. Methods and Results We performed a multicenter, randomized, 6-month evaluation of the clinical effects of AV junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker (Abl+Pm) versus pharmacological treatment in 43 patients with intolerable, recurrent paroxysmal AF of three or more episodes in the previous 6 months not controlled with three or more antiarrhythmic drugs. Before completion of the study, 3 patients in the drug group withdrew because of the severity of their symptoms and 1 patient assigned to the Abl+Pm group in whom the ablation procedure failed. At the end of the 6 months, the 21 patients of the Abl+Pm group who completed the study showed, in comparison with the 18 of the drug group, lower scores in the Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (−51%, P =.0006), palpitations (−71%, P =.0000), effort dyspnea (−36%, P =.04), exercise intolerance score (−46%, P =.001), and easy fatigue (−51%, P =.02). The scores for rest dyspnea, chest discomfort, and NYHA functional classification were also lower (−56%, −50%, and −17%, respectively) in the Abl+Pm group, although not significantly. At the end of the study, palpitations were no longer present in 81% of the Abl+Pm group and in 11% of the drug group ( P =.0000). AF was documented in 31 of 122 visits (25%) in the Abl+Pm group and in 9 of 107 examinations (8%) in the drug group ( P =.0005); chronic AF developed in 5 (24%) and 0 (0%) in the two groups, respectively ( P =.04). Conclusions In patients with paroxysmal AF not controlled by pharmacological therapy, Abl+Pm treatment is highly effective and superior to drug therapy in controlling symptoms and improving quality of life. The discontinuation of drug therapy exposes patients to further recurrences of paroxysmal AF and the risk of developing permanent AF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3