Sphygmomanometrically Determined Pulse Pressure Is a Powerful Independent Predictor of Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function

Author:

Mitchell Gary F.1,Moyé Lemuel A.1,Braunwald Eugene1,Rouleau Jean-Lucien1,Bernstein Victoria1,Geltman Edward M.1,Flaker Greg C.1,Pfeffer Marc A.1,Investigators for the SAVE1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (G.F.M., E.B., M.A.P.); the University of Texas Health Science Center and the School of Public Health, Houston (L.A.M.); the Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal, Québec (J.-L.R.), the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia (V.B.); Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (E.M.G.); and the University of Missouri Health Science Center, Columbia (G.C.F.).

Abstract

Background There is increasing evidence of a link between conduit vessel stiffness and cardiovascular events, although the association has never been tested in a large post–myocardial infarction patient population. Methods and Results We evaluated the relationship between baseline pulse pressure, measured by sphygmomanometry 3 to 16 days after myocardial infarction, and subsequent adverse clinical events in the 2231 patients enrolled in the SAVE Trial. Increased pulse pressure was associated with increased age, left ventricular ejection fraction, female sex, history of prior infarction, diabetes, and hypertension and use of digoxin and calcium channel blockers. Over a 42-month period, there were 503 deaths, 422 cardiovascular deaths, and 303 myocardial infarctions. Pulse pressure was significantly related to each of these end points as a univariate predictor. In a multivariate analysis, pulse pressure remained a significant predictor of total mortality (relative risk, 1.08 per 10 mm Hg increment in pulse pressure; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.17; P <.05) and recurrent myocardial infarction (relative risk, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.23; P <.05) after control for age; left ventricular ejection fraction; mean arterial pressure; sex; treatment arm (captopril or placebo); smoking history; history of prior myocardial infarction, diabetes, or hypertension; and treatment with β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, aspirin, or thrombolytic therapy. Conclusions These data provide strong evidence for a link between pulse pressure, which is related to conduit vessel stiffness, and subsequent cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 324 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3