Selective contribution of two types of carotid sinus baroreceptors to the control of blood pressure.

Author:

Seagard J L1,Hopp F A1,Drummond H A1,Van Wynsberghe D M1

Affiliation:

1. Zablocki Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI 53295.

Abstract

This study was performed to determine if selective elimination of afferent input from two different types of previously described baroreceptors altered the ability of the dog to regulate blood pressure (BP), examining specifically if there was differential loss of baroreceptor control of tonic levels of baseline pressure versus dynamic changes in pressure. In the first series of experiments in this study, anodal block of the carotid sinus nerve was used to selectively block afferent input in a sequence from large-diameter A-fiber carotid baroreceptors (mostly type I) to smaller A-fiber and nonmyelinated C-fiber baroreceptors (mostly type II). In the second series of experiments, anesthetic block of the carotid sinus nerve with bupivacaine was used to selectively eliminate afferent input in reverse order from anodal block, first blocking input from baroreceptors with small afferent fibers and then additionally eliminating input from the larger-diameter A-fiber baroreceptors. The effects of selective elimination of each baroreceptor type were determined by monitoring baseline BP during constant carotid sinus pressure (CSP) perfusion of a vascularly isolated carotid sinus (tonic control) and obtaining baroreflex sensitivity (slope) during ramp pressure stimulations of the carotid sinus (dynamic control) under various blocking conditions. Low levels of anodal block significantly attenuated baroreflex sensitivity (-0.84 +/- 0.11 versus -0.63 +/- 0.10 mm Hg BP/mm Hg CSP) at levels of block that had no effect on tonic baseline BP (158.41 +/- 9.5 versus 160.7 +/- 9.5 mm Hg BP). In contrast, low levels of bupivacaine block produced significant increases in tonic BP (158.8 +/- 6.4 versus 169.0 +/- 6.5 mm Hg BP), whereas there was no effect on dynamic baroreflex sensitivity (-0.85 +/- 0.08 versus -0.73 +/- 0.08 mm Hg BP/mm Hg CSP). Thus, blocking large A-fiber baroreceptors resulted in significant decreases in baroreflex sensitivity without changes in baseline levels of BP, indicating primarily an attenuation in dynamic baroreflex regulation. Blocking of smaller A-fiber and unmyelinated C-fiber baroreceptors resulted in smaller decreases in baroreflex sensitivity and significant elevations in baseline BP, indicating a loss of tonic control of pressure. These results suggest that the two types of baroreceptors contribute differently to the regulation of blood pressure.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology

Cited by 96 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3