Long‐Term Outcomes of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Author:

Jiang Xiaolang12ORCID,Liu Yifan3,Zou Lingwei12,Chen Bin12,Jiang Junhao12,Fu Weiguo12,Dong Zhihui124ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Institute of Vascular Surgery Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai China

2. National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine Shanghai China

3. Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University Guangzhou China

4. Center for Vascular Surgery and Wound Care Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai China

Abstract

Background The treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection by thoracic endovascular aortic repair has some challenges, and its long‐term outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the 5‐year clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection, compare the differences between patients with and without adverse aortic events (AAEs), and identify risk factors for AAEs. Methods and Results Patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection from January 2009 to June 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The primary end points were AAEs, including aorta‐related death, procedural complications, and disease progression requiring reintervention. Clinical outcomes were described at the 5‐year follow‐up visit. The secondary end point was the comparison of the results between patients with and without AAEs. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for AAEs. A total of 214 patients were enrolled. AAEs occurred in 46 (21.5%) patients. Compared with patients without AAEs, those with AAEs had higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection (26.1% versus 4.2%, P <0.001) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (69.6% versus 11.3%, P <0.001), and a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis (23.9% versus 89.9%, P <0.001). Meanwhile, the median interval from symptom onset to intervention was longer in patients with AAEs (26 months versus 12 months, P =0.004). Partial or no false lumen thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.71 [95% CI, 5.67–38.14; P <0.001]) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (AOR, 10.16 [95% CI, 3.86–26.73; P <0.001]) were identified as independent risk factors for AAEs. Conclusions While thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection might be challenging in some cases, its long‐term outcomes appeared promising as this treatment was effective in preventing catastrophic aortic events. Patients with AAEs showed higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm, a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis, and a longer median interval from symptom onset to intervention. Failure of complete false lumen thrombosis and an aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm were predictors of AAEs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3