Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Diastolic Function and Coronary Microvascular Function on Cardiovascular Death

Author:

Hong David1ORCID,Lee Seung Hun2ORCID,Shin Doosup3ORCID,Choi Ki Hong1ORCID,Kim Hyun Kuk4ORCID,Ha Sang Jin5,Joh Hyun Sung1ORCID,Park Taek Kyu1ORCID,Yang Jeong Hoon1ORCID,Song Young Bin1ORCID,Hahn Joo‐Yong1ORCID,Choi Seung‐Hyuk1ORCID,Gwon Hyeon‐Cheol1ORCID,Lee Joo Myung1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul South Korea

2. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School Gwangju South Korea

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Duke University Medical Center Durham NC

4. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center Chosun University Hospital, University of Chosun College of Medicine Gwangju South Korea

5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital University of Ulsan College of Medicine Gangneung Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been considered as a possible cause of cardiac diastolic dysfunction. The current study evaluated the association between cardiac diastolic dysfunction and CMD, and their prognostic implications in patients without significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction and epicardial coronary stenosis. Methods and Results A total of 330 patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction ≥50%) and significant epicardial coronary stenosis (fractional flow reserve >0.80) were analyzed. Cardiac diastolic dysfunction was defined by echocardiographic parameters (early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity, e' velocity, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and left atrial volume index). Overt CMD was defined as coronary flow reserve <2.0 and index of microcirculatory resistance ≥25 U. The primary end point was cardiovascular death or admission for heart failure during 5 years of follow‐up. In patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction and significant epicardial coronary stenosis, prevalence of cardiac diastolic dysfunction and overt CMD was 25.5% and 11.2%, respectively. Overt CMD was independently associated with cardiac diastolic dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio, 3.440 [95% CI, 1.599–7.401]; P =0.002). Patients with cardiac diastolic dysfunction showed significantly higher risk of the primary outcome than those without (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.996 [95% CI, 1.888–4.755]; P <0.001). Patients with overt CMD also showed significantly higher risk of the primary outcome than those without (adjusted HR, 2.939 [95% CI, 1.642–5.261]; P <0.001). Presence of overt CMD was associated with significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death among the patients with cardiac diastolic dysfunction (43.8% versus 14.5%; P =0.006) but not in patients without cardiac diastolic dysfunction (interaction P <0.001). Inclusion of overt CMD into the model with cardiac diastolic dysfunction significantly improved predictive ability for cardiovascular death or heart failure admission (conconrdance index, 0.719 versus 0.737; P for comparison=0.034). Conclusions There was significant association between the presence of cardiac diastolic dysfunction and overt CMD. Both cardiac diastolic dysfunction and overt CMD were associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death or admission for heart failure. Integration of overt CMD into cardiac diastolic dysfunction showed improvement of the risk stratification in patients without significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction and epicardial coronary stenosis. Registration DIAST‐CMD (Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Diastolic Function and Coronary Microvascular Function) registry; Unique identifier: NCT05058833.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3