The VIVA Trial

Author:

Henry Timothy D.1,Annex Brian H.1,McKendall George R.1,Azrin Michael A.1,Lopez John J.1,Giordano Frank J.1,Shah P.K.1,Willerson James T.1,Benza Raymond L.1,Berman Daniel S.1,Gibson C. Michael1,Bajamonde Alex1,Rundle Amy Chen1,Fine Jennifer1,McCluskey Edward R.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Divisions of Cardiology at Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (T.D.H.); Duke University Medical Center and Durham Veterans Affair Medical Center, Durham, NC (B.H.A.); Rhode Island Hospital, Brown Medical School, Providence (G.R.M.); University of Connecticut Medical Center, Farmington (M.A.A.); University of Iowa, Iowa City (J.J.L.); University of California, San Diego Medical Center (F.J.G.); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (P.K.S., D.S...

Abstract

Background— Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor protein (rhVEGF) stimulates angiogenesis in animal models and was well tolerated in Phase I clinical trials. VIVA (Vascular endothelial growth factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracoronary and intravenous infusions of rhVEGF. Methods and Results— A total of 178 patients with stable exertional angina, unsuitable for standard revascularization, were randomized to receive placebo, low-dose rhVEGF (17 ng · kg −1 · min −1 ), or high-dose rhVEGF (50 ng · kg −1 · min −1 ) by intracoronary infusion on day 0, followed by intravenous infusions on days 3, 6, and 9. Exercise treadmill tests, angina class, and quality of life assessments were performed at baseline, day 60, and day 120. Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed at baseline and day 60. At day 60, the change in exercise treadmill test (ETT) time from baseline was not different between groups (placebo, +48 seconds; low dose, +30 seconds; high dose, +30 seconds). Angina class and quality of life were significantly improved within each group, with no difference between groups. By day 120, placebo-treated patients demonstrated reduced benefit in all three measures, with no significant difference compared with low-dose rhVEGF. In contrast, high-dose rhVEGF resulted in significant improvement in angina class ( P =0.05) and nonsignificant trends in ETT time ( P =0.15) and angina frequency ( P =0.09) as compared with placebo. Conclusions— rhVEGF seems to be safe and well tolerated. rhVEGF offered no improvement beyond placebo in all measurements by day 60. By day 120, high-dose rhVEGF resulted in significant improvement in angina and favorable trends in ETT time and angina frequency.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 903 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3