Integral indicators of the quality of medical care – the way to build a high-quality health care system of Ukraine and the implementation of the best global practices for evaluating the effectiveness of health care technologies

Author:

Hladkykh F.V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Organization «Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», Kharkiv, Ukraine; V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Background. About 60% of deaths from treatable conditions are caused by poor health care, while the remaining deaths result from failure to use the health care system. High-quality health systems can prevent 2.5 million deaths from cardiovascular disease, 1 million newborn deaths, 900,000 deaths from tuberculosis and half of all maternal deaths each year. Wasting resources and catastrophic costs are economic side effects of low-quality health care systems. As a result, only one quarter of people in low- and middle-income countries believe their health systems are working well. Purpose – to summarize the current information on approaches to the indicative assessment of the quality of medical care. Materials and Methods. Publications were selected based on the databases PubMed, Clinical Key Elsevier, Cochrane Library, eBook Business Collection, and Google Scholar, which covered information on the assessment of the quality of medical care. At the first stage, literature sources were searched for Keywords: quality of medical care, quality measurement, quality indicators. At the second stage, summaries of articles were studied and publications that did not meet the research criteria were excluded. At the third stage, the full texts of the selected articles were studied for compliance with the criteria for inclusion in the literature list and research relevance. Results. Clinical quality of care is related to the interactions between health care providers and patients and the ways in which health system data are translated into health outcomes. The problem of insufficient efficiency of medical service providers, and as a result insufficient coverage of high-quality medical care, is particularly acute in low- and middle-income countries. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, among low- and middle-income countries, Ukraine is one of the countries with a below-average income. The National Health Service of Ukraine, which was established in December 2017, acts as the central executive body that implements state policy in the field of state financial guarantees of medical care for the population under the program of medical guarantees. Quality indicators are measurement tools used for quantitative assessment of effectiveness, safety and/or patient orientation. The terms «indicator» and «indicator» are often used interchangeably, but in the context of quality, it is more appropriate to use the term «quality indicator» for measures that are accompanied by evaluation. Many quality measurement systems form a large number of quality indicators, which made it necessary to develop methods of combining various indicators into the so-called integral quality indicators (IQI). The most important component of the successful creation of a highly accurate and statistically acceptable IiY is the normalization of individual indicative indicators that are part of it by applying weighting factors. Conclusions. Integral quality indicators are aimed at reducing individual quality indicators to a single final indicator. A key assumption underlying the use of integral indicators is that the component parts together provide a fair summary of the whole.

Publisher

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Reference30 articles.

1. Tello JE, Barbazza E, Waddell K. Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards. Health Policy. 2020;124(1):12–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.006

2. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet. Global health. 2018;6(11):e1196–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3

3. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550475

4. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance global report on surveillance. Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. URL: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/112642

5. Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. URL: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/30C-sectioncosts.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3