Harm and governance of prisons’ systemic overcrowding

Author:

Santorso SimoneORCID

Abstract

Overcrowding has been on the national policy agendas of many jurisdictions for decades. While many other aspects of punishment are largely investigated as penal policy-related issues, overcrowding has not received the same attention. This article investigates how we may best understand prison congestion by considering it as a widely accepted operational condition for many prison systems. Following a brief introduction on how overcrowding is a structural problem in many jurisdictions, the essay is developed into three independent, but related, parts: an analysis of overcrowding and its definitional issues that includes a discussion of the theoretical and epistemological challenges it poses; a discussion of the impact and legitimacy of congestion on incarceration experience via the notion of ‘harm’; and, finally, the discussion of the concept of ‘governance of systemic overcrowding’. By doing so the paper aims to challenge the current knowledge on prison overcrowding and wants to suggest a new analytical standpoint, which, however, is deserving of further research.

Publisher

Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Reference79 articles.

1. Albrecht, H.J., 1988. Particular Difficulties in Enforcing the Law arising out of basic Conflicts Between the Different Agencies Regarding the Best Suited Reactions upon Highly Sensitive Kinds of Crime. In: Council of Europe, ed., Interactions within the Criminal Justice System. Strasbourg, 41–82.

2. Albrecht, H.J., 2012. Prison overcrowding–finding effective solutions: strategies and best practices against overcrowding in correctional facilities [online]. Edition Iuscrim. Available at: https://static.mpicc.de/shared/data/pdf/research_in_brief_43_-_albrecht_prisonvercrowding.pdf

3. Baggio, S., et al., 2020. Do overcrowding and turnover cause violence in prison? Frontiers in Psychiatry [online], 10, 1015–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01015

4. Behan, C., 2022. No longer a “collateral consequence”: Imprisonment and the reframing of citizenship. European Journal of Criminology [online], 19(6), 1283–1303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820961066

5. Bleich, J., 1989. The politics of prison crowding. California Law Review [online], 77(5), 1125–1180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480644

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3