BONE-CEREBRAL CHANNEL REAMING IN THE TREATMENT OF LIMBS BONE FRACTURES
Author:
Mansyrov Asif Baglar oglyORCID, Lytovchenko ViktorORCID, Garyachiy YevgeniyORCID, Lytovchenko AndriyORCID
Abstract
The object of the study: clinical effect of intramedullary blocking osteosynthesis of fractures of the bones of the extremities without reaming of the bone marrow canal. The problem to be solved: determination of the influence of surgical technology of intramedullary blocking osteosynthesis of bone fractures without reaming of the bone marrow canal on the qualitative and anatomical and functional results of treatment. Main scientific results. The term of fusion of bone fragments in complete groups (including all localizations) in the group of patients who underwent surgery with reaming of the bone marrow canal was 4.21±0.46 months, while in the group without reaming of the canal it was much shorter – 3.47±0.51 months Faster functional recovery of the limbs was also observed in cases that precluded bone marrow reaming – 96 % of good and 4 % satisfactory scores were obtained (80 % good and 20 % satisfactory in bone marrow reaming). The technology of closed intramedullary blocking osteosynthesis without reaming of the bone marrow can optimize the time of fusion of bone fragments and get 91 % good and 9 % satisfactory results. Its effectiveness is to reduce the number of satisfactory treatment results by 19 %, the absence of unsatisfactory and increase the share of good results by 23 %. The area of practical use of research results: clinics of traumatological profile of different levels, in which surgical treatment of fractures of the bones of the extremities are done. An innovative technological product: technology of closed intramedullary blocking osteosynthesis without reaming of the bone marrow canal. The area of application of an innovative technological product: clinical practice of using the technology of closed intramedullary blocking osteosynthesis without reaming of the bone marrow canal.
Publisher
OU Scientific Route
Reference24 articles.
1. Nazarov, Kh. N., Linnik, S. A., Musoev, D. S., Mirzoev, R. R. (2016). Frequency, prevention and treatment of false joints in victims with concomitant and multiple lower limb injury (camile). Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk Tadzhikistana, 4, 63–69. 2. Glatt, V., Evans, C. H., Tetsworth, K. (2017). A Concert between Biology and Biomechanics: The Influence of the Mechanical Environment on Bone Healing. Frontiers in Physiology, 7. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00678 3. Rommens, P. M., Kuechle, R., Hofmann, A., Dietz, S.-O. (2018). Repositionstechniken in der Marknagelosteosynthese. Der Unfallchirurg, 122 (2), 95–102. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-018-0560-1 4. Alt, V., Simpson, H., Miclau, T. (2017). Intramedullary nailing – Evolution of treatment. Injury, 48, S1–S2. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.034 5. Born, C. T., Pidgeon, T., Taglang, G. (2014). 75 years of contemporary intramedullary nailing. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, (28 (8)), 1–2.
|
|