Early versus delayed debridement for surgical site infection after oncological neurosurgery

Abstract

Background: There are no guidelines on the management of surgical site infection (SSI) in neurosurgery. This study sought to analyze whether early debridement improved survival compared to antibiotic therapy alone in patients with postcraniotomy infections after oncological neurosurgeries. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patient records from 2011 to 2019 to identify patients that had been reoperated for the debridement of SSI after brain tumor resection. If SSI was suspected but not clinically evident, the diagnosis was confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis or contrast-based imaging examinations. Immediately after diagnosis, broad-spectrum antibiotics were started for all patients. Results: Out of 81 SSI cases, 57 underwent debridement. Two patients were reoperated 3 times, and three had two surgeries, resulting in a total of 64 procedures. The number of days between SSI diagnosis and surgical intervention did not influence mortality in both univariate and multivariable analyses (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.93–1.13). Early debridement (<24 h) did not influence rates of antibiotic prescription at discharge (P = 0.53) or hospital length of stay (LOS) (P = 0.16). Higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) were associated with the lower survival (HR 1.05, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.08). Multiple cutoffs were tested and values above 3.5 are more significantly associated with worse outcomes (HR 2.2; 95%CI 1.1–4.2). Conclusion: Early debridement does not seem to influence the survival, rates of antibiotic at discharge, or hospital LOS of patients presenting with SSI after neurosurgery for intracranial tumors. High NLRs are strong predictors of worse prognosis in this population.