Pooling isolates to address the diversity in antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis

Author:

Van den Bossche Sara1,Abatih Emmanuel2,Grassi Lucia1,De Broe Emma1,Rigole Petra1,Boelens Jerina34,Van Caenegem Joris3,Verhasselt Bruno34,Janssens Iris567,Van Braeckel Eva56,Versmessen Nick4,Cools Piet4,Coenye Tom1ORCID,Crabbé Aurélie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium

2. Data Analysis and Statistical Science (DASS), Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium

3. Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent, Belgium

4. Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium

5. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cystic Fibrosis Reference Centre, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent, Belgium

6. Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium

7. Center for Inflammation Research, Flemish Institute for Biotechnology , Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

ABSTRACT The intrasample diversity in antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) may contribute to the low predictive value of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). Since often only few isolates per AST are included, a possible solution to decrease the diversity is pooling isolates, yet a comprehensive study on this approach is lacking. This study aims to characterize the intrasample diversity in antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa and to assess if pooling isolates could lower diversity. In 15 pwCF, 30 P . aeruginosa isolates were collected per patient sputum sample, and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for three antibiotics commonly used to treat cystic fibrosis patients to evaluate intrasample diversity. Next, the minimal number of isolates necessary to be pooled for a consistent MIC was determined. Finally, we assessed if the MIC result of pooled versus single isolates could influence clinical interpretation. Intrasample MIC diversity was observed in most samples, with the highest frequencies for aztreonam and ceftazidime. Pooling isolates decreased diversity, and for each sputum sample, a consistent MIC was obtained after pooling two to nine isolates. The minimal number of pooled isolates for consistent MIC positively correlated with MIC diversity in single isolate testing. MIC diversity and categorical disagreement were correlated, and the level of categorical disagreement decreased in most samples when pooling nine isolates. Also, pooling isolates did not decrease the frequency of resistance detection in most samples. In conclusion, intrasample MIC diversity clearly impacts AST outcome for P. aeruginosa in pwCF, and pooling isolates is a promising approach to lower diversity. IMPORTANCE People with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) often suffer from chronic lung infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa . While antibiotics are still commonly used to treat P. aeruginosa infections, there is a high discordance between in vitro and in vivo antibiotic efficacy, which contributes to suboptimal antibiotic therapy. In the present study, we found that isolates from the same sputum sample had highly diverse antibiotic resistance profiles [based on the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)], which may explain the reported discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo antibiotic efficacy. Through systematic analysis, we report that pooling nine isolates per sputum sample significantly decreased intrasample diversity in MIC and influenced clinical interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility tests compared to single isolate testing. Hence, pooling of isolates may offer a solution to obtain a consistent MIC test result and could lead to optimizing antibiotic therapy in pwCF and other infectious diseases where diversity in antibiotic resistance is observed.

Funder

Fund Alphonse and Jean Forton; Belgian Cystic Fibrosis Association

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Cell Biology,Microbiology (medical),Genetics,General Immunology and Microbiology,Ecology,Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3