Affiliation:
1. Scientific Affairs
2. Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
3. Microbiology, BODE Chemie GmbH, Hamburg
Abstract
ABSTRACT
For assessment of the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection, European reference method prEN 12791 prescribes that the hands must be kept wet with the reference alcohol for 3 min regardless of the applied volume. The aim of this study was to determine whether the applied volume of the reference disinfectant
n
-propanol (60%, vol/vol) influences the effect on the resident hand flora. Ten experiments with 200 reference disinfections were analyzed. Hands were washed for 1 min with soap. The bacterial prevalue was obtained by rubbing fingertips in tryptic soy broth for 1 min. After this, each subject treated the hands with
n
-propanol (60%, vol/vol) by using as many portions as necessary to keep hands wet for a total of 3 min. Bacterial postvalues (immediate effect) were obtained for one hand, and the other hand was gloved for 3 h. After the gloves were taken off, a second postvalue was obtained (sustained effect). Most surgical reference disinfections (73%) were achieved with 9 ml of the reference alcohol, followed by 12 ml (24%) and 6 ml (3%). There was no significant difference between the mean log
10
reduction values for the three treatment groups, both in terms of the immediate effect (
P
= 0.333, as determined by analysis of variance) and in terms of the sustained effect (
P
= 0.442). A higher number of portions did not correlate with a higher reduction factor (for immediate effect, Pearson's correlation coefficient = −0.028 [
P
= 0.689]; for sustained effect, Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.059 [
P
= 0.404]). If the hands were kept wet with the reference alcohol for the total application time, the applied volume could vary, but this did not alter the efficacy.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference19 articles.
1. Anonymous. 1994. Tentative final monograph for health care antiseptic products; proposed rule. Fed. Regist.59:31401-31452.
2. Berardesca, E., and H. I. Maibach. 1988. Skin occlusion: treatment or drug-like device? Skin Pharmacol.1:207-215.
3. Boyce, J. M., and D. Pittet. 2002. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.51:1-45.
4. CEN-Comité Européen de Normalisation. 1997. prEN 12791. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Surgical hand disinfection. Test method and requirement (phase 2 step 2). CEN-Comité Européen de Normalisation Brussels Belgium.
5. Kampf, G., and M. Kapella. 2003. Suitability of Sterillium Gel for surgical hand disinfection. J. Hosp. Infect.54:222-225.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献