Evaluation of Biolog system for identification of some gram-negative bacteria of clinical importance

Author:

Holmes B1,Costas M1,Ganner M1,On S L1,Stevens M1

Affiliation:

1. Central Public Health Laboratory, London, England.

Abstract

The Biolog system (Biolog, Inc., Hayward, Calif.) was evaluated for the identification of 55 gram-negative taxa (789 strains) likely to be encountered commonly in clinical laboratories. The Biolog system performed best with oxidase-positive fermenters and biochemically active nonfermenters and had the most problems with unreactive nonfermenters. It gave significantly better results when the MicroPlates were read manually rather than when they were read by the automated reader. Plates read manually gave the following performances: oxidase-positive fermenters, five taxa, 64 strains, 92% correct, 3% not identified, and 5% incorrect; biochemically active nonfermenters, eight taxa, 122 strains, 88% correct, 6% not identified, and 6% incorrect; members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 35 taxa, 511 strains, 77% correct, 8% not identified, and 15% incorrect; unreactive nonfermenters, seven taxa, 92 strains, 38% correct, 24% not identified, and 38% incorrect. We found the system easy to use, but while for 39 of 55 of the taxa an identification rate of > 70% was achieved, problems were encountered, particularly with identification of capsulated strains of some Enterobacter and Klebsiella taxa, as well as the least biochemically active Moraxella and Neisseria strains.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Reference9 articles.

1. Species identification of Aeromonas strains based on carbon substrate oxidation profiles;Carnahan A. M.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1989

2. Costas M. 1992. Classification identification and typing of bacteria by the analysis of their one-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic protein patterns p. 351-408. In A. Chrambach M. J. Dunn and B. J. Radola (ed.) Advances in electrophoresis vol. 5. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Weinheim Germany.

3. Costas M. B. Holmes S. L. W. On and D. E. Stead. 1992. Identification of medically important Pseudomonas species using computerized methods p. 1-19. In R. G. Board D. Jones and F. A. Skinner (ed.) Identification methods for microbiologists 3rd ed. SAB technical series no. 29. Academic Press London.

4. Grimont F. and P. A. D. Grimont. 1992. The genus Enterobacter p. 2797-2815. In A. Balows H. G. Truper M. Dworkin W. Harder and K.-H. Schleifer (ed.) The prokaryotes-a handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology isolation identification applications 2nd ed. vol. III. Springer-Verlag New York.

5. A revised probability matrix for the identification of gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, fermentative bacteria;Holmes B.;J. Gen. Microbiol.,1986

Cited by 67 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3