Insights on transport performance, thermodynamic properties, and mechanical properties of Ruddlesden–Popper antiperovskite LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 and LiBr(Li3OBr)2

Abstract

Due to high ion conductivity, low cost, and adjustable composition, antiperovskite has attracted much attention as a potentially useful material in solid-state batteries. Compared with simple antiperovskite, Ruddlesden–Popper (R–P) antiperovskite is an updated material, which is not only more stable but also reported to significantly enhance conductivity when added to simple antiperovskite. However, systematic theoretical research on R–P antiperovskite is scarce, hindering its further development. In this study, the recently reported easily synthesized R–P antiperovskite LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 is calculated for the first time. Comparative calculations were conducted on the transport performance, thermodynamic properties, and mechanical properties of H-rich LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 and H-free LiBr(Li3OBr)2. Our results indicate that due to the presence of protons, LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 is more prone to defects, and synthesizing more LiBr Schottky defects can improve its Li-ion conductivity. Young’s modulus of the LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 is as low as 30.61 GPa, which is beneficial for its application as a sintering aid. However, the calculated Pugh’s ratio (B/G) of 1.28 and 1.50, respectively, indicates that R–P antiperovskites LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 and LiBr(Li3OBr)2 exhibit mechanical brittleness, which is not conducive to its application as solid electrolytes. Through quasi-harmonic approximation, we found that the linear thermal expansion coefficient of LiBr(Li2OHBr)2 is 2.07 × 10−5 K−1, which is more advantageous in matching electrodes than LiBr(Li3OBr)2 and even simple antiperovskites. Overall, our research provides comprehensive insights into the practical application of R–P antiperovskite in solid-state batteries.