Digital Humanities and Distributed Cognition: From a Lack of Theory to its Visual Augmentation

Author:

Windhager Florian1ORCID,Mayr Eva1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universität für Weiterbildung Krems

Abstract

Digital humanists have often been criticized as too technology-driven and for a lack of theoretical work. In this paper, we discuss theories from Cognitive Science on the extended mind, which provide a productive framework to theorize the use of tools and technologies for the sake of cognitive self-enhancement. Viewed through this lens, humans continuously self-amplify their natural cognitive resources and processes by extending and offloading them to interactions with artifacts and other individuals in their environment. Concepts of extended cognition further sharpen the focus on multiple types of distribution: from the outlined internal-external distribution to the propositional-visual distribution of cognition, but also for the multi-instrumental distribution across multiple types of tools and tool specialist. All these aspects are relevant for future debates about a “theory gap” in the digital humanities: DH mainly builds external, technological tools, while traditional humanities develop conceptual tools—including theories—to enable and enhance the study of complex cultural phenomena. Notwithstanding the value of confrontational discussions, we argue for the benefits of understanding the strengths and limitations of instruments on both sides—and for working toward future synergies and ecologies of the humanities’ tools and minds. In this regard, we show how visualization-based DH tools might might play a major role in closing the comprehensibility gap of traditional theories in the arts and humanities.

Publisher

CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics

Reference137 articles.

1. Reconsidering Group Cognition: From Conceptual Confusion to a Boundary Area Between Cognitive and Socio-cultural Perspectives?;Sanne, et al. Akkerman;Educational Research Review,2007

2. SoS TextVis: An Extended Survey of Surveys on Text Visualization;Mohammad Alharbi;Computers,2019

3. Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities;Daniel, et al. Allington;Los Angeles Review of Books,2016

4. Distributed Cognition and the Humanities;Miranda, et al. Anderson,2019

5. From Cognitive Amplifiers to Cognitive Prostheses: Understandings of the Material Basis of Cognition in Visual Analytics;Richard, et al Arias-Hernandez;Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3