A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Reasons for the Use or Nonuse of Assistive Technologies in the Aging Population

Author:

Abrilahij Afsaneh1,Boll Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Abstract

Abstract. Models of the use of assistive technologies (ATs) have only moderate value for predicting older people’s actual use of ATs. To find further predictors, we performed a systematic literature review and – applying an action-theoretical approach – a metasynthesis of seven qualitative studies about the reasons older people use or fail to use ATs. We found 25 reasons referring to user’s beliefs and desires (e.g., related to demand, act of using ATs, its consequences), 18 of which were not contained in existing AT use models. Some reasons generalized across ATs (e.g., perceived unreliability), whereas others (e.g., privacy concerns, desire to avoid burden to others) appeared specific to telealarm or smart-home technology. We discuss findings with respect to improving AT use models and developmental counseling.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology

Reference36 articles.

1. Abrilahij, A. & Boll, T. (2018). A systematic review of self-care assistive technologies for aging population. In T. Boll, D. Ferring, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Cultures of care in aging (pp. 273–313). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

2. Abrilahij, A. & Boll, T. (2019). Models applicable to older people use of assistive technologies: A comparative evaluation. Manuscript submitted for publication

3. Exploring Seniors' Views on the Use of Assistive Devices in Fall Prevention

4. Brandtstädter, J. (2006). Action perspectives on human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1 pp. 516–568). New York, NY: Wiley.

5. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3