The band count imprecision – a Croatian multicentric pilot study

Author:

Lapić Ivana1,Šimac Brankica1,Horvat Martina1,Krešić Branka1,Smaić Fran1,Tomić Franciska1,Vidranski Valentina1,Vuga Ivana1,Radišić Biljak Vanja2,Jureša Višnja1

Affiliation:

1. Working Group for Laboratory Hematology of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine

2. Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Graphical abstract Highlights • Band counting is unreliable practice due to the high inter-observer variability • 2015 International Council for Standardization in Haematology guidelines recommend to count band neutrophils as segmented neutrophils • The inclusion of bands within the white blood cell differential is still used in Croatia • There is a very high variability in enumerating bands among Croatian laboratories • There is a need for national recommendations that will endorse ICSH guidelines IntroductionDue to high inter-observer variability the 2015 International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations state to count band neutrophils as segmented neutrophils in the white blood cell (WBC) differential. However, the inclusion of bands as a separate cell entity within the WBC differential is still widely used in hematology laboratories in Croatia. The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the degree of inter-observer variability in enumerating band neutrophils within the WBC differential among Croatian laboratories. Materials and methodsSeven large Croatian hospital laboratories from different parts of the country participated in the study. In each of 7 participating laboratories, one blood smear, that was flagged by the analyzer as possibly having bands, was evaluated by all personnel participating in the analysis of hematology samples. Between-observer manual smear reproducibility was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) and calculated using the following formula: CV (%) = (standard deviation (SD)/mean value) x 100%. ResultsThe CVs (%) and relative band neutrophil counts in participating laboratories were as follows: 15.4% (16-24), 19.2% (16-32), 19.5% (17-40), 21.1% (17-44), 35.0% (8-26), 51.9% (3-29), and remarkably high 62.4% (12-59). For segmented neutrophils CVs were lower, ranging from 7.4% to 32.2%. The CVs did not correlate with the number of staff members in each hospital (P = 0.293). ConclusionsThis study revealed very high variability in enumerating band neutrophil count in the blood smear differential among all participants, thus prompting a need for action on a national level.

Publisher

Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3