Expert Elicitation To Estimate the Feed Safety Impact of Criteria Included in the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Risk Assessment Model for Feed Mills

Author:

LACHAPELLE VIRGINIE1,RACICOT MANON12,COMEAU GENEVIÈVE1,RHOUMA MOHAMED13,LEROUX ALEXANDRE4,NOUBISSIE ORNELLA WAFO4,PROVOST FRANCE1,ZANABRIA ROMINA4,GAUCHER MARIE-LOU3,COSTA MARCIO3,CHORFI YOUNÈS3,HOLLEY RICK5,SMILLIE JOHN6,BOSCH MY-LIEN7,DUMAS ANDRÉ8,BROCKHOFF EGAN9,COLLINS STEPHANIE10,SNELGROVE PHIL11,QUESSY SYLVAIN3

Affiliation:

1. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada J2S 2M2

2. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-5901 [M. Racicot])

3. Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada J2S 2M2;

4. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1400 Merivale Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0Y9;

5. University of Manitoba, Department of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2;

6. College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A8;

7. Animal Nutrition Association of Canada, 300 Sparks Street, Suite 330, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1R 7S3;

8. Center for Aquaculture Technologies Canada, 20 Hope Street, P.O. Box 388, Souris, Prince Edward Island, Canada C0A 2B0;

9. Canadian Pork Council, 900-220 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 5Z9;

10. Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, 58 Sipu Road, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada B2N 5E3; and

11. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 59 Camelot Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0Y9

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Canadian Food Inspection Agency is developing an Establishment-based Risk Assessment (ERA) model for commercial and on-farm mills involved in the manufacture, storage, packaging, labeling, or distribution of livestock feed (ERA–Feed Mill model). This model will help inform the allocation of inspection resources on the basis of feed safety risk, including animal health and food safety risk. In a previous study, 34 risk factors, grouped into inherent, mitigation, and compliance clusters, along with assessment criteria were selected. The objective of this current study was to estimate the relative risk (RR) of the 203 assessment criteria on the basis of the impact on feed safety to design an ERA–Feed Mill model algorithm. Furthermore, the intent of this study was to assess the maximum increase or decrease of risk obtained when multiple criteria belonging to a same cluster were identified in a specific feed mill. To do so, a two-round face-to-face expert elicitation was conducted with 28 Canadian feed experts. Results showed no significant association between respondent profiles (years of experience and work sector) and estimated RR. Uniformity of answers between experts improved between rounds. Criteria having the highest increase in risk (median RR ≥ 4) included the presence of materials prohibited to be fed to ruminants in a facility that produces ruminant feed, the presence of multiple livestock species on-site, and historical noncompliances related to the inspection of the feed mill's process control and end-product control programs. Risk mitigation criteria having the highest impact on decreasing the risk were the implementation of feed safety certifications, the use of dedicated manufacturing lines (prohibited materials or medications), and having a hazard sampling plan in place for finished feed. The median RR assigned to each criterion and cluster will be used to build an algorithm of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's ERA–Feed Mill model. HIGHLIGHTS

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Reference52 articles.

1. Anonymous. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Available at: https://www.inspection.gc.ca/eng/1297964599443/1297965645317. Accessed14April2020.

2. Anonymous. Health of Animals Regulations (C.R.C., c. 296). Available at: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/C.R.C.,_c._296/index.html. Accessed 14 April 2020.

3. Anonymous. The Establishment-based Risk Assessment (ERA) model for food establishments. Available at: https://www.inspection.gc.ca/about-cfia/strategic-priorities/era-models/era-model-for-food-establishments/eng/1551995065897/1551995066162. Accessed15April2020.

4. Anonymous. Establishment-based Risk Assessment models. Available at: https://www.inspection.gc.ca/about-cfia/strategic-priorities/era-models/eng/1564406870713/1564406870963. Accessed14April2020.

5. Anonymous. FeedAssure®. Available at: https://www.anacan.org/anac/feedassure/index.html. Accessed15April2020.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3