Accuracy of pattern deviation in estimating the glaucomatous damage in the central 10° visual field in eyes with glaucoma and cataract

Author:

Tomita RyoORCID,Asaoka RyoORCID,Hirasawa KazunoriORCID,Fujino YuriORCID,Nakakura ShunsukeORCID,Murata Hiroshi,Omura Tetsuo,Shoji Nobuyuki,Obana Akira,Nishiguchi Koji M,Tanito Masaki

Abstract

Background/aimsThe accuracy of pattern deviation (PD) in estimating the damage to the glaucomatous visual field (VF) in the central 10° in eyes with glaucoma and cataract is unclear.MethodsThis retrospective study includes 63 eyes of 52 glaucoma patients who successfully underwent cataract surgery or cataract surgery plus iStent implantation. Using the Humphrey Field Analyser 10–2 test, VF was measured within 6 months preoperatively and postoperatively (VFpreand VFpost, respectively). The mean total deviation values in VFpost(mTDpost) indicates glaucomatous damage without cataract and the difference between this value and mean PD values in VFpre(mPDpre) was evaluated (εmPD). The effect of cataract was then evaluated as the difference between mTDpostand mTDpre(ΔmTD), while the effects of mTDpostand ΔmTD on εmPD were also assessed. In addition, based on preoperative visual acuity (VApre) and VFpre, the optimal model for predicting mTDpostwas identified. The error of this method (εOptimalModel) was estimated as the difference against mTDpost, which was compared with εmPD.ResultsCompared with mTDpre, there was a significant improvement in mTDpost(p=0.028). A significant difference was observed between mPDpreand mTDpost(p<0.001). Further, εmPD significantly increased with the increase of mTDpostor ΔmTD (p<0.001 and p=0.0444, respectively). The absolute εOptimalModel was significantly smaller than the absolute εmPD (p<0.001).ConclusionsThis study warns clinicians that PD of the central 10° VF might underestimate the glaucomatous VF damage with the progression of glaucoma and overestimate it as a cataract progresses.

Funder

Japan Glaucoma Society Research Project Support Program

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3