Long-term effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised controlled trial

Author:

Kataoka KensukeORCID,Nishiyama OsamuORCID,Ogura Takashi,Mori Yoshihiro,Kozu RyoORCID,Arizono ShinichiORCID,Tsuda Tohru,Tomioka HiromiORCID,Tomii KeisukeORCID,Sakamoto KojiORCID,Ishimoto HiroshiORCID,Kagajo Michiko,Ito Hiroyuki,Ichikado KazuyaORCID,Sasano Hajime,Eda Seiichirou,Arita Machiko,Goto YasuhiroORCID,Hataji OsamuORCID,Fuke Satoshi,Shintani Ryota,Hasegawa Hirotsugu,Ando Masahiko,Ogawa Tomoya,Shiraishi Masashi,Watanabe Fumiko,Nishimura KoichiORCID,Sasaki Takuma,Miyazaki ShinjiroORCID,Saka HideoORCID,Kondoh YasuhiroORCID

Abstract

BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by worsening dyspnoea and exercise intolerance.Research questionDoes a long-term pulmonary rehabilitation improve exercise tolerance in patients with IPF treated with standard antifibrotic drugs, which are expected to reduce disease progression?MethodsThis open-label randomised controlled trial was performed at 19 institutions. Stable patients receiving nintedanib were randomised into pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups (1:1). The pulmonary rehabilitation group underwent initial rehabilitation which included twice-weekly sessions of monitored exercise training for 12 weeks, followed by an at-home rehabilitation programme for 40 weeks. The control group received usual care only, without pulmonary rehabilitation. Both groups continued to receive nintedanib. The primary and main secondary outcomes were change in 6 min walking distance (6MWD) and change in endurance time (using cycle ergometry) at week 52.ResultsEighty-eight patients were randomised into pulmonary rehabilitation (n=45) and control (n=43) groups. Changes in 6MWD were −33 m (95% CI −65 to −1) and −53 m (95% CI −86 to −21) in the pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (mean difference, 21 m (95% CI −25 to 66), p=0.38). Changes in endurance time were significantly better in the pulmonary rehabilitation (64 s, 95% CI −42.3 to 171)) than in the control (−123 s (95% CI −232 to −13)) group (mean difference, 187 s (95% CI 34 to 153), p=0.019).InterpretationAlthough pulmonary rehabilitation in patients taking nintedanib did not improve 6MWD in the long term, it led to prolonged improvement in endurance time.Trial registration numberUMIN000026376.

Funder

Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3