Abstract
BackgroundMeeting sex partners online is associated with increased risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections. We examined whether different venues where men who have sex with men (MSM) meet sex partners was associated with prevalentChlamydia trachomatis(CT) andNeisseria gonorrhoeae(NG) infection, and whether prevalence increased during (vs before) the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from San Diego’s ‘Good To Go’ sexual health clinic from two enrolment periods: (1) March–September 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and (2) March–September 2021 (during COVID-19). Participants completed self-administered intake assessments. This analysis included males aged ≥18 years self-reporting sex with males within 3 months before enrolment. Participants were categorised as (1) meeting new sex partners in-person only (eg, bars, clubs), (2) meeting new sex partners online (eg, applications, websites) or (3) having sex only with existing partners. We used multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for year, age, race, ethnicity, number of sex partners, pre-exposure prophylaxis use and drug use to examine whether venue or enrolment period were associated with CT/NG infection (either vs none).ResultsAmong 2546 participants, mean age was 35.5 (range: 18–79) years, 27.9% were non-white and 37.0% were Hispanic. Overall, CT/NG prevalence was 14.8% and was higher during COVID-19 vs pre-COVID-19 (17.0% vs 13.3%). Participants met sex partners online (56.9%), in-person (16.9%) or only had existing partners (26.2%) in the past 3 months. Compared with having only existing sex partners, meeting partners online was associated with higher CT/NG prevalence (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.32; 95% CI 1.51 to 3.65), while meeting partners in-person was not associated with CT/NG prevalence (aOR 1.59; 95% CI 0.87 to 2.89). Enrolment during COVID-19 was associated with higher CT/NG prevalence compared with pre-COVID-19 (aOR 1.42; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.79).ConclusionsCT/NG prevalence appeared to increase among MSM during COVID-19, and meeting sex partners online was associated with higher prevalence.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
National Institute on Drug Abuse
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Dermatology
Reference30 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Men who have sex with men (MSM). sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines. 2021. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/msm.htm#:~:text=Studies%20have%20demonstrated%20that%20among,%25%2C%20respectively%20(171) [Accessed 1 May 2022].
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Impact of COVID-19 on Stds. centers for disease control and prevention. 2022. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/impact.htm [Accessed 1 May 2022].
3. Extragenital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Among Community Venue–Attending Men Who Have Sex with Men — Five Cities, United States, 2017
4. Mobile phone and Internet use mostly for sex-seeking and associations with sexually transmitted infections and sample characteristics among black/African American and Hispanic/Latino men who have sex with men in 3 US cities;Allen;Sex Transm Dis,2017
5. Sex on demand: geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles county