International consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia

Author:

Bowness James SimeonORCID,Pawa AmitORCID,Turbitt LloydORCID,Bellew BoyneORCID,Bedforth Nigel,Burckett-St Laurent David,Delbos Alain,Elkassabany NabilORCID,Ferry Jenny,Fox Ben,French James L H,Grant Calum,Gupta Ashwani,Harrop-Griffiths William,Haslam Nat,Higham HelenORCID,Hogg RosemaryORCID,Johnston David FORCID,Kearns Rachel JoyceORCID,Kopp SandraORCID,Lobo ClaraORCID,McKinlay SonyaORCID,Memtsoudis Stavros,Merjavy PeterORCID,Moka Eleni,Narayanan MadanORCID,Narouze SamerORCID,Noble J Alison,Phillips David,Rosenblatt MegORCID,Sadler Amy,Sebastian Maria Paz,Taylor AlasdairORCID,Thottungal AthmajaORCID,Valdés-Vilches Luis FernandoORCID,Volk ThomasORCID,West Simeon,Wolmarans Morné,Womack Jonathan,Macfarlane Alan James RobertORCID

Abstract

There is no universally agreed set of anatomical structures that must be identified on ultrasound for the performance of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) techniques. This study aimed to produce standardized recommendations for core (minimum) structures to identify during seven basic blocks. An international consensus was sought through a modified Delphi process. A long-list of anatomical structures was refined through serial review by key opinion leaders in UGRA. All rounds were conducted remotely and anonymously to facilitate equal contribution of each participant. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for “orientation scanning” (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for the “block view” (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). Strong recommendations for inclusion were made if ≥75% of participants rated a structure as “definitely include” in any round. Weak recommendations were made if >50% of participants rated a structure as “definitely include” or “probably include” for all rounds (but the criterion for “strong recommendation” was never met). Thirty-six participants (94.7%) completed all rounds. 128 structures were reviewed; a “strong recommendation” is made for 35 structures on orientation scanning and 28 for the block view. A “weak recommendation” is made for 36 and 20 structures, respectively. This study provides recommendations on the core (minimum) set of anatomical structures to identify during ultrasound scanning for seven basic blocks in UGRA. They are intended to support consistent practice, empower non-experts using basic UGRA techniques, and standardize teaching and research.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3