Boosting and broadening recruitment to UK cancer trials: towards a blueprint for action

Author:

Nanton VeronicaORCID,Bryan Richard TORCID,Pope Anne M,Hughes Ana,Jefferson Kieran,Catto James W FORCID,Knight Allen,Gallagher Jean,Mintz Harriet PaigeORCID,Pirrie Sarah JORCID,Liu WenyuORCID,Young AnnieORCID,Patel PrashantORCID,James Nicholas DORCID

Abstract

Recruitment and retention in cancer trials are long-standing issues, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The UK National Institute of Health Research and leading clinicians have emphasised the urgency to achieve and surpass prepandemic levels of participation.Data from a recent UK trial demonstrated the impact of COVID-19 and highlighted factors that limited recruitment. In response to this worldwide problem, studies have identified strategies for remediation at the levels of funding, the research environment, study design and trial team-related aspects, yet evidence of progress is lacking.Equality, diversity and inclusivity have become central to UK health and social policy during the 2000s. The need for greater inclusivity in trials has become a particular concern for cancer researchers and funders in the UK and in the USA, in recognition of potential bias in results. In the UK trials, the lack of standardised recording of ethnicity data renders interpretation difficult and caution is required in comparisons with the USA.Recently, the focus of concern has shifted away from the impact of deprivation and low socioeconomic status on trial participation. Barriers created by these factors and their frequent intersection with ethnicity should not be overlooked.The UK has adopted an advisory approach to broadening recruitment, publishing policy documents, guidance and toolkits. In the USA, by contrast, action on inclusion is increasingly mandated. Within the UK paradigm, the cancer research community is strongly encouraged to adopt a coordinated approach towards standardised digital data collection and embed and evaluate innovative, cocreated, locally relevant strategies.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Reference68 articles.

1. National Institute for Research (NIHR) . Best research for best health: the next chapter. 2021. Available: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/patients-carers-and-the-public/ [Accessed 3 Mar 2023].

2. ICR . Improving access to clinical trials 2021. Available: https://www.icr.ac.uk/about-us/policy-and-engagement/trial-access [Accessed 5 Mar 2023].

3. Companies House . Equality, diversity and inclusion strategy 2020-2025 2020. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1120675/EDI_strategy_Companies_House.pdf [Accessed 3 Mar 2023].

4. Marmot M . Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. BMJ 2020;368:m693. doi:10.1136/bmj.m693

5. Comparing an imaging-guided pathway with the standard pathway for staging muscle-invasive bladder cancer: preliminary data from the Bladderpath study;Bryan;Eur Urol,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3