Intermediate catheter use is associated with complete occlusion and dense packing in coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a propensity score matched study

Author:

Fuga MichiyasuORCID,Ishibashi ToshihiroORCID,Aoki KenORCID,Tachi Rintaro,Irie Koreaki,Kato NaokiORCID,Kan Issei,Hataoka Shunsuke,Nagayama Gota,Sano Tohru,Tanaka Toshihide,Murayama YuichiORCID

Abstract

BackgroundAn intermediate catheter (IMC) can improve the maneuverability and stability of the microcatheter.ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of using an IMC in triaxial systems for coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs).MethodsA total of 2430 consecutive saccular UCAs (2259 patients) that underwent initial coil embolization at three institutions between November 2003 and May 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups: with IMC (IMC(+)) and without IMC (IMC(−)). To investigate whether IMC use increased the rate of complete occlusion and the packing density, a propensity score-matched analysis was used to control for clinical, anatomical, and procedural features.ResultsUltimately, 595 (24.5%) coil embolization used an IMC. Propensity score matching was successful for 424 paired IMC(+) and IMC(−) aneurysms. Compared with the IMC(−) group, the IMC(+) group had significantly higher rate of Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification class 1 immediately after treatment (30.0% vs 20.8%, P=0.003) and at 6 months (28.8% vs 20.0%, P=0.004) and a higher volume embolization ratio (27.2% (SD 6.5%) vs 25.9% (SD 6.2%), P=0.003). Re-treatment rates were not significantly different between the two groups (0.7% vs 0.2%, P=0.624). No significant differences in the incidences of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications and IMC-related parent artery dissection were found between the two groups.ConclusionUse of IMCs in triaxial systems can provide effective and safe support in coil embolization of UCAs because complete occlusion and dense coil packing can be achieved without increased complications.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3