Incidence, nature and causes of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England: retrospective case note review

Author:

Avery Anthony JORCID,Sheehan Christina,Bell Brian,Armstrong Sarah,Ashcroft Darren M,Boyd Matthew JORCID,Chuter Antony,Cooper Alison,Donnelly Ailsa,Edwards Adrian,Evans Huw Prosser,Hellard Stuart,Lymn Joanne,Mehta Rajnikant,Rodgers Sarah,Sheikh AzizORCID,Smith Pam,Williams Huw,Campbell Stephen M,Carson-Stevens Andrew

Abstract

ObjectiveTo estimate the incidence of avoidable significant harm in primary care in England; describe and classify the associated patient safety incidents and generate suggestions to mitigate risks of ameliorable factors contributing to the incidents.DesignRetrospective case note review. Patients with significant health problems were identified and clinical judgements were made on avoidability and severity of harm. Factors contributing to avoidable harm were identified and recorded.SettingPrimary care.ParticipantsThirteen general practitioners (GPs) undertook a retrospective case note review of a sample of 14 407 primary care patients registered with 12 randomly selected general practices from three regions in England (total list size: 92 255 patients).Main outcome measuresThe incidence of significant harm considered at least ‘probably avoidable’ and the nature of the safety incidents.ResultsThe rate of significant harm considered at least probably avoidable was 35.6 (95% CI 23.3 to 48.0) per 100 000 patient-years (57.9, 95% CI 42.2 to 73.7, per 100 000 based on a sensitivity analysis). Overall, 74 cases of avoidable harm were detected, involving 72 patients. Three types of incident accounted for more than 90% of the problems: problems with diagnosis accounted for 45/74 (60.8%) primary incidents, followed by medication-related problems (n=19, 25.7%) and delayed referrals (n=8, 10.8%). In 59 (79.7%) cases, the significant harm could have been identified sooner (n=48) or prevented (n=11) if the GP had taken actions aligned with evidence-based guidelines.ConclusionThere is likely to be a substantial burden of avoidable significant harm attributable to primary care in England with diagnostic error accounting for most harms. Based on the contributory factors we found, improvements could be made through more effective implementation of existing information technology, enhanced team coordination and communication, and greater personal and informational continuity of care.

Funder

NIHR Policy Research Programme

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy

Reference46 articles.

1. World Health Organization,, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development,, The World Bank . Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage, 2018. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272465 [Accessed 17 Aug 2020].

2. Iatrogenic harm in primary care;Sheikh;Harvard Health Policy Review,2014

3. NHS Digital . Appointments in general practice, 2018. Available: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/appointments-in-general-practice/oct-2018 [Accessed 17 Aug 2020].

4. Berwick DM , Shojania KG , Atchinson BK . Free from harm: accelerating patient safety improvement fifteen years after to err is human. Boston, MA: National Patient Safety Foundation, 2015.

5. Safer primary care for all: a global imperative;Sheikh;Lancet Glob Health,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3