Abortion patients’ perspectives on enhancing a telemedicine model of post-abortion contraception: a qualitative study

Author:

Boydell NicolaORCID,Buijsen Sophie,Reynolds-Wright John JosephORCID,Cameron Sharon TORCID,Harden JeniORCID

Abstract

BackgroundAccess to post-abortion contraception (PAC) is critical for reducing unintended pregnancies and supporting reproductive decision-making. Patients often face challenges in identifying, accessing and initiating their preferred contraceptive methods post-abortion. This may be particularly so with telemedicine models of care with absence of in-person appointments, and reduced opportunities to provide some contraceptive methods. This qualitative service evaluation explored patients' perspectives on PAC consultations and decision-making to inform future PAC service models in the era of telemedicine.MethodsQualitative interviews with 15 patients who had telemedicine medical abortion at home up to 12 weeks’ gestation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsContraceptive discussions during pre-abortion consultations were valued for supporting informed choices about future contraceptive use. Decision-making was influenced by previous contraception experiences, emotional state at the time of abortion and concerns about contraceptive ‘failure’. Some preferred non-hormonal methods due to past negative experiences with hormonal contraceptives. However, limited information about 'natural' contraceptive methods and concerns about discussing these with healthcare professionals were described. Barriers to accessing preferred methods, particularly long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), included reduced availability of appointments and caring responsibilities. Fast-tracked appointments for LARC fitting post-abortion were valued. The need for flexible PAC consultations and access after abortion, for example, remote consultations complemented by personalised interactions with sexual and reproductive health experts, was emphasised.ConclusionThe findings highlight the need for flexible and more accessible PAC service models in the era of telemedicine care to ensure timely access to preferred contraceptive methods.

Funder

The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute

NHS Lothian

Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Reference37 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Abortion care guideline. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, 2022.

2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Abortion care: NICE guideline [NG140]. London, UK: NICE, 2019.

3. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) . FSRH Guideline: contraception after pregnancy. London, UK: FSRH, 2017.

4. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG) . Best practice in post-abortion care. London, UK: RCOG, 2022.

5. Development and Validation of a Reproductive Autonomy Scale

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3