Experiences using a progestin-only pill in an over-the-counter environment in the United States: a cross-sectional survey

Author:

Grindlay KateORCID,Key Katherine,Zuniga CarmelaORCID,Wollum Alexandra,Grossman DanielORCID,Blanchard KellyORCID

Abstract

BackgroundEfforts are underway to make a progestin-only pill (POP) over the counter (OTC) in the United States (US); however, little is known about POP user experiences, which could impact uptake and continuation.MethodsFrom January 2020–September 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey with individuals who used OTC POPs in a US trial. We calculated descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to assess menstrual bleeding acceptability, how OTC POP experiences compared with prior contraceptive methods, and preferred ways to get answers to questions during OTC POP use.ResultsAmong 550 adult and 115 adolescent participants, 80% (n=531) felt their menstrual bleeding was acceptable. Participants reported a range of menstrual bleeding experiences compared with prior long-acting or hormonal methods used; 58% (n=84) said the POP bleeding was similar or better and 36% (n=53) said it was worse. Among participants who used contraception in the month prior to the trial, 77% (n=201) said their overall OTC POP experience was similar or better. Top benefits compared with prior methods included less worry about pregnancy, ease of access, fewer side effects, and greater decision-making power. Adults preferred to get answers about OTC POPs via webpage or app, whereas teens preferred asking pharmacists or other healthcare providers.ConclusionsOverall, OTC POP users in a trial setting found the menstrual bleeding acceptable and the method similar to or better than previous methods. POP labelling should provide clear messaging about bleeding changes users may experience.

Funder

Arnold Ventures

Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity

David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Over-the-counter access to hormonal contraception: ACOG Committee opinion, number 788;Obstet Gynecol,2019

2. Prevalence of contraindications to progestin-only contraceptive pills in a multi-institution patient database;Dutton;Contraception,2021

3. Raymond EG , Grossman D . Progestin-Only Pills. In: Hatcher RA , Nelson AL , Trussell J , et al , eds. Contraceptive technology. 21 Edition. New York, NY: Ayer Company Publishers, Inc, 2018: 317–26.

4. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016

5. Contraindications to progestin-only oral contraceptive pills among reproductive-aged women;White;Contraception,2012

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3