Abstract
IntroductionCommunication is considered a key skill for physicians globally and has formed a central part of medical curricula since the WHO identified it as a key attribute of the ‘5-star doctor’. Communication of poor prognosis to patients and caregivers is particularly challenging, yet an important example of physicians’ clinical communication, and a priority within palliative care research. Knowledge is scarce regarding the different positions physicians adopt during poor prognosis communication, especially in sub-Saharan countries.MethodsThis qualitative study took place at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana’s Central Region. Physicians in the internal medicine department, with experience in communicating poor prognosis to patients and families on a weekly basis were purposively sampled. Based on the concept of information power, a maximum variation of participants, in terms of age, sex, seniority and experience was achieved after conducting 10 semistructured interviews in March 2019. Positioning theory was used as a theoretical lens to inform study design. The data were analysed through a constructivist thematic analysis approach.ResultsPhysicians adopted six positions, considered as six different themes, during their communication of poor prognosis: clinical expert, educator, counsellor, communicator, protector and mentor. Physicians’ choice of position was fluid, guided by local context and wider health system factors. Physicians’ desire to communicate with patients and families in a way that met their needs highlighted three key challenges for communication of poor prognosis: linguistic difficulties, pluralistic health beliefs and the role of family. These challenges presented ethical complexities in relation to autonomy and non-maleficence.ConclusionContext is key to physicians’ communication of poor prognosis. Communication of poor prognosis is multifaceted, complex and unpredictable. Physicians’ communication training should be developed to emphasise contextual circumstances and physician support, and international policy models on physicians’ roles developed to include a greater focus on social accountability.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference62 articles.
1. Palliative care and human rights: a decade of evolution in standards;Ezer;J Pain Symptom Manage,2018
2. World Health Orgnization . Sustainable Development Goals for 2030. [Internet. Geneva: World Health Organizaion, 2019. https://www.who.int/sdg/targets/en/. (cited 11th December 2019).
3. World Health Organization . Definition of Palliative Care. [Internet. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/. (cited 11th December 2019).
4. Strengthening of palliative care as a component of integrated treatment throughout the life course;J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother,2014
5. Palliative Care Alliance . Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End of Life. [Internet. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014. https://www.who.int/nmh/Global_Atlas_of_Palliative_Care.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献