Abstract
ObjectivesResearch indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.DesignJBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published inBMJ Open.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.Eligibility criteriaStudies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.Data extraction and synthesisData were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.ResultsSixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.ConclusionHP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.
Reference119 articles.
1. Marmot M . Fairer society healthy lives: the marmot review. Strategy review of health inequalities in england, 2010. Available: https://www.gov.uk/research-for-development-outputs/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review-strategic-review-of-health-inequalities-in-england-post-2010
2. Black D . London Pengiun; Inequalities in helath: the black report, 1980. Available: https://www.sochealth.co.uk/national-health-service/public-health-and-wellbeing/poverty-and-inequality/the-black-report-1980/the-origin-of-the-black-report/
3. Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications
4. The human gut microbiome and health inequalities;Amato;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2021
5. Contribution of health behaviors to the association between area-level socioeconomic status and cancer mortality