Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Li BenORCID,Jacob-Brassard Jean,Dossa FahimaORCID,Salata Konrad,Kishibe Teruko,Greco Elisa,Baxter Nancy N,Al-Omran Mohammed

Abstract

ObjectiveMany studies have analysed gender bias in academic medicine; however, no comprehensive synthesis of the literature has been performed. We conducted a pooled analysis of the difference in the proportion of men versus women with full professorship among academic physicians.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Education Resources Information Center and PsycINFO were searched from inception to 3 July 2020.Study selectionAll original studies reporting faculty rank stratified by gender worldwide were included.Data extraction and synthesisStudy screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with a third author resolving discrepancies. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.ResultsOur search yielded 5897 articles. 218 studies were included with 991 207 academic physician data points. Men were 2.77 times more likely to be full professors (182 271/643 790 men vs 30 349/251 501 women, OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.57 to 2.98). Although men practised for longer (median 18 vs 12 years, p<0.00002), the gender gap remained after pooling seven studies that adjusted for factors including time in practice, specialty, publications, h-index, additional PhD and institution (adjusted OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.20). Meta-regression by data collection year demonstrated improvement over time (p=0.0011); however, subgroup analysis showed that gender disparities remain significant in the 2010–2020 decade (OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.48 to 2.80). The gender gap was present across all specialties and both within and outside of North America. Men published more papers (mean difference 17.2, 95% CI 14.7 to 19.7), earned higher salaries (mean difference $33 256, 95% CI $25 969 to $40 542) and were more likely to be departmental chairs (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.12).ConclusionsGender inequity in academic medicine exists across all specialties, geographical regions and multiple measures of success, including academic rank, publications, salary and leadership. Men are more likely than women to be full professors after controlling for experience, academic productivity and specialty. Although there has been some improvement over time, the gender disparity in faculty rank persists.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020197414.

Funder

Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery National Student Research Award

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference73 articles.

1. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) . FACTS: Applicants, Matriculants, Enrollment, Graduates, MD/PhD, and Residency Applicants Data [Internet], 2018. Available: https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/ [Accessed 23 Dec 2018].

2. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) . The State of Women in Academic Medicine: The Pipeline and Pathways to Leadership, 2015-16 [Internet], 2016. Available: https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics/ [Accessed 23 Dec 2018].

3. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) . U.S. Medical School Faculty by Sex and Rank, 2017 [Internet], 2017. Available: https://www.aamc.org/download/486130/data/17table9.pdf [Accessed 23 Dec 2018].

4. American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) . Department Chairs by Department, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity, 2017 [Internet], 2017. Available: https://www.aamc.org/download/486590/data/supplementaltablec.pdf [Accessed 23 Dec 2018].

5. American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) . U.S. Medical School Dean Trends by Dean Type and Sex, December 31 Snaphsots [Internet], 2017. Available: https://www.aamc.org/download/486596/data/supplementaltablef.pdf [Accessed 23 Dec 2018].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3