Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study
Author:
Hibbert Peter DORCID, Raggett Louise, Molloy Charlotte J, Westbrook JohannaORCID, Magrabi Farah, Mumford VirginiaORCID, Clay-Williams RobynORCID, Lingam Raghu, Salmon Paul M, Middleton SandyORCID, Roberts Mike, Bradd Patricia, Bowden Steven, Ryan Kathleen, Zacka Mark, Sketcher-Baker Kirstine, Phillips Andy, Birks Lanii, Arya Dinesh K, Trevorrow Catherine, Handa Suchit, Swaminathan Girish, Carson-Stevens AndrewORCID, Wiig SiriORCID, de Wet Carl, Austin Elizabeth EORCID, Nic Giolla Easpaig Brona, Wang Ying, Arnolda GastonORCID, Peterson Gregory MORCID, Braithwaite JeffreyORCID
Abstract
IntroductionAt least 10% of hospital admissions in high-income countries, including Australia, are associated with patient safety incidents, which contribute to patient harm (‘adverse events’). When a patient is seriously harmed, an investigation or review is undertaken to reduce the risk of further incidents occurring. Despite 20 years of investigations into adverse events in healthcare, few evaluations provide evidence of their quality and effectiveness in reducing preventable harm.This study aims to develop consistent, informed and robust best practice guidance, at state and national levels, that will improve the response, learning and health system improvements arising from adverse events.Methods and analysisThe setting will be healthcare organisations in Australian public health systems in the states of New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory. We will apply a multistage mixed-methods research design with evaluation and in-situ feasibility testing. This will include literature reviews (stage 1), an assessment of the quality of 300 adverse event investigation reports from participating hospitals (stage 2), and a policy/procedure document review from participating hospitals (stage 3) as well as focus groups and interviews on perspectives and experiences of investigations with healthcare staff and consumers (stage 4). After triangulating results from stages 1–4, we will then codesign tools and guidance for the conduct of investigations with staff and consumers (stage 5) and conduct feasibility testing on the guidance (stage 6). Participants will include healthcare safety systems policymakers and staff (n=120–255) who commission, undertake or review investigations and consumers (n=20–32) who have been impacted by adverse events.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been granted by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH02007 and 2023/ETH02341).The research findings will be incorporated into best practice guidance, published in international and national journals and disseminated through conferences.
Funder
Clinical Excellence Commission Clinical Excellence QLD Safer Care Victoria National Health and Medical Research Council ACT Health
Reference62 articles.
1. World Health Organization . Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021. 2. The application of the global trigger tool: a systematic review;Hibbert;Int J Qual Health Care,2016 3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . The state of patient safety and quality in Australian hospitals 2019 . Sydney, NSW, Australia: ACSQHC, 2019. 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s health 2018 . Canberra, ACT, Australia: AIHW, 2018. 5. Anesthesia patient safety: next steps to improve worldwide perioperative safety by 2030;Warner;Anesthesia & Analgesia,2022
|
|