Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study

Author:

Hibbert Peter DORCID,Raggett Louise,Molloy Charlotte J,Westbrook JohannaORCID,Magrabi Farah,Mumford VirginiaORCID,Clay-Williams RobynORCID,Lingam Raghu,Salmon Paul M,Middleton SandyORCID,Roberts Mike,Bradd Patricia,Bowden Steven,Ryan Kathleen,Zacka Mark,Sketcher-Baker Kirstine,Phillips Andy,Birks Lanii,Arya Dinesh K,Trevorrow Catherine,Handa Suchit,Swaminathan Girish,Carson-Stevens AndrewORCID,Wiig SiriORCID,de Wet Carl,Austin Elizabeth EORCID,Nic Giolla Easpaig Brona,Wang Ying,Arnolda GastonORCID,Peterson Gregory MORCID,Braithwaite JeffreyORCID

Abstract

IntroductionAt least 10% of hospital admissions in high-income countries, including Australia, are associated with patient safety incidents, which contribute to patient harm (‘adverse events’). When a patient is seriously harmed, an investigation or review is undertaken to reduce the risk of further incidents occurring. Despite 20 years of investigations into adverse events in healthcare, few evaluations provide evidence of their quality and effectiveness in reducing preventable harm.This study aims to develop consistent, informed and robust best practice guidance, at state and national levels, that will improve the response, learning and health system improvements arising from adverse events.Methods and analysisThe setting will be healthcare organisations in Australian public health systems in the states of New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory. We will apply a multistage mixed-methods research design with evaluation and in-situ feasibility testing. This will include literature reviews (stage 1), an assessment of the quality of 300 adverse event investigation reports from participating hospitals (stage 2), and a policy/procedure document review from participating hospitals (stage 3) as well as focus groups and interviews on perspectives and experiences of investigations with healthcare staff and consumers (stage 4). After triangulating results from stages 1–4, we will then codesign tools and guidance for the conduct of investigations with staff and consumers (stage 5) and conduct feasibility testing on the guidance (stage 6). Participants will include healthcare safety systems policymakers and staff (n=120–255) who commission, undertake or review investigations and consumers (n=20–32) who have been impacted by adverse events.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been granted by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH02007 and 2023/ETH02341).The research findings will be incorporated into best practice guidance, published in international and national journals and disseminated through conferences.

Funder

Clinical Excellence Commission

Clinical Excellence QLD

Safer Care Victoria

National Health and Medical Research Council

ACT Health

Publisher

BMJ

Reference62 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021.

2. The application of the global trigger tool: a systematic review;Hibbert;Int J Qual Health Care,2016

3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . The state of patient safety and quality in Australian hospitals 2019 . Sydney, NSW, Australia: ACSQHC, 2019.

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s health 2018 . Canberra, ACT, Australia: AIHW, 2018.

5. Anesthesia patient safety: next steps to improve worldwide perioperative safety by 2030;Warner;Anesthesia & Analgesia,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3