Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review

Author:

Guerra-Paiva SofiaORCID,Lobão Maria João,Simões Diogo Godinho,Fernandes Joana,Donato Helena,Carrillo IreneORCID,Mira José JoaquínORCID,Sousa Paulo

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to map and frame the main factors present in support interventions successfully implemented in health organisations in order to provide timely and adequate response to healthcare workers (HCWs) after patient safety incidents (PSIs).DesignScoping review guided by the six-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and by PRISMA-ScR.Data sourcesCINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, reference lists of the eligible articles, websites and a consultation group.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesEmpirical studies (original articles) were prioritised. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018 to conduct a quality assessment of the eligible studies.Data extraction and synthesisA total of 9766 records were retrieved (last update in November 2022). We assessed 156 articles for eligibility in the full-text screening. Of these, 29 earticles met the eligibility criteria. The articles were independently screened by two authors. In the case of disagreement, a third author was involved. The collected data were organised according to the Organisational factors, People, Environment, Recommendations from other Audies, Attributes of the support interventions. We used EndNote to import articles from the databases and Rayyan to support the screening of titles and abstracts.ResultsThe existence of an organisational culture based on principles of trust and non-judgement, multidisciplinary action, leadership engagement and strong dissemination of the support programmes’ were crucial factors for their effective implementation. Training should be provided for peer supporters and leaders to facilitate the response to HCWs’ needs. Regular communication among the implementation team, allocation of protected time, funding and continuous monitoring are useful elements to the sustainability of the programmes.ConclusionHCWs’ well-being depends on an adequate implementation of a complex group of interrelated factors to support them after PSIs.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference87 articles.

1. Health Care Professionals as Second Victims after Adverse Events

2. The Emotional Impact of Medical Errors on Practicing Physicians in the United States and Canada

3. Vanhaecht K , Seys D , Russotto S , et al . An evidence and consensus-based definition of second victim: A strategic topic in Healthcare quality, patient safety. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:16869. doi:10.3390/ijerph192416869

4. World Health Organization . Patient safety incident reporting and learning systems: technical report and guidance. Geneva, 2020.

5. NHS England . Report a patient safety incident [Internet] [Redditch]. 2022. Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/patient-safety/report-patient-safety-incident/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3