Public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities

Author:

McNulty CliodnaORCID,Sides EirwenORCID,Thomas Amy,Kamal Atiya,Syeda Rowshonara B,Kaissi Awatif,Lecky Donna MORCID,Patel Mahendra,Campos-Matos Ines,Shukla Rashmi,Brown Colin S,Pareek Manish,Sollars Loretta,Nellums LauraORCID,Greenway Jane,Jones Leah FfionORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore public reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic across diverse ethnic groups.DesignRemote qualitative interviews and focus groups in English or Punjabi. Data were transcribed and analysed through inductive thematic analysis.SettingEngland and Wales, June to October 2020.Participants100 participants from 19 diverse ‘self-identified’ ethnic groups.ResultsDismay, frustration and altruism were reported across all ethnic groups during the first 6–9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Dismay was caused by participants’ reported individual, family and community risks, and loss of support networks. Frustration was caused by reported lack of recognition of the efforts of ethnic minority groups (EMGs), inaction by government to address COVID-19 and inequalities, rule breaking by government advisors, changing government rules around: border controls, personal protective equipment, social distancing, eating out, and perceived poor communication around COVID-19 and the Public Health England COVID-19 disparities report (leading to reported increased racism and social isolation). Altruism was felt by all, in the resilience of National Health Service (NHS) staff and their communities and families pulling together. Data, participants’ suggested actions and the behaviour change wheel informed suggested interventions and policies to help control COVID-19.ConclusionTo improve trust and compliance future reports or guidance should clearly explain any stated differences in health outcomes by ethnicity or other risk group, including specific messages for these groups and concrete actions to minimise any risks. Messaging should reflect the uncertainty in data or advice and how guidance may change going forward as new evidence becomes available. A contingency plan is needed to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 across all communities including EMGs, the vulnerable and socially disadvantaged individuals, in preparation for any rise in cases and for future pandemics. Equality across ethnicities for healthcare is essential, and the NHS and local communities will need to be supported to attain this.

Funder

Public Health England

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. World Health Organisation . World Health Organisation (WHO) Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard, 2021. Available: https://covid19.who.int/

2. Public Health England . COVID-19: review of disparities in risks and outcomes, 2020. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-review-of-disparities-in-risks-and-outcomes

3. Department of Health and Social Care, Office for National Statistics, Government Actuary’s Department and Home Office . Direct and indirect impacts of COVID-19 on excess deaths and morbidity - December 2020 update, 17 December 2020, 2021. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dhsconsgadho-direct-and-indirect-impacts-of-covid-19-on-excess-deaths-and-morbidity-december-2020-update-17-december-2020

4. Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Sze;EClinicalMedicine,2020

5. The impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic review;Pan;EClinicalMedicine,2020

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3