Women’s experiences with using patient-reported outcome and experience measures in routine perinatal care in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

Author:

Laureij Lyzette TORCID,Depla Anne L,Kariman Shariva S,Lamain-de Ruiter Marije,Ernst -Smelt Hiske E,Hazelzet Jan Antonius,Franx Arie,Bekker Mireille N

Abstract

ObjectivesTo gain insight into the experiences of women with completing and discussing patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and tailoring their care based on their outcomes.DesignA mixed-methods prospective cohort study.SettingSeven obstetric care networks in the Netherlands that implemented a set of patient-centred outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth (PCB set), published by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement.ParticipantsAll women, receiving the PROM and PREM questionnaires as part of their routine perinatal care, received an invitation for a survey (n=460) and an interview (n=16). The results of the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics; thematic inductive content analysis was applied on the data from open text answers and the interviews.ResultsMore than half of the survey participants (n=255) felt the need to discuss the outcomes of PROM and PREM with their care professionals. The time spent on completing questionnaires and the comprehensiveness of the questions was scored ‘good’ by most of the survey participants. From the interviews, four main themes were identified: content of the PROM and PREM questionnaires, application of these outcomes in perinatal care, discussing PREM and data capture tool. Important facilitators included awareness of health status, receiving personalised care based on their outcomes and the relevance of discussing PREM 6 months post partum. Barriers were found in insufficient information about the goal of PROM and PREM for individual care, technical problems in data capture tools and discrepancy between the questionnaire topics and the care pathway.ConclusionsThis study showed that women found the PCB set an acceptable and useful instrument for symptom detection and personalised care up until 6 months post partum. This patient evaluation of the PCB set has several implications for practice regarding the questionnaire content, role of care professionals and congruity with care pathways.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Porter ME , Teisberg EO . Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Harvard Business Press, 2006.

2. Gliklich RD , Leavy M . Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide [Internet]. 2014.

3. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance

4. Patient-Reported Outcomes — Harnessing Patients’ Voices to Improve Clinical Care

5. Implementation of patient-reported outcomes in routine medical care;Basch;Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3